Nothing that isnt anecdotaldo you have information supporting these facts..?
Flat Earthers.....HOLD THIS L!!!!!!!!!!
- Thread starter Dafunkdoc_Unlimited
- Start date
Friction creates heat
That didn't come from NASA, it came from Dutch Prime Minister Willem Drees. It was in his collection since 1969. He died in 1988 and the piece of wood was sent to the museum.
Now, could that be what NASA gave him? Yes....but it's equally possible someone stole the original and replaced it in the two decades it sat in his house. It was worth a lot of money, after all.
Which brings me to my next point....
You do realize if this was some sort of sinister conspiracy....you wouldn't be reading about it on NBC News, right?
Fred.
Now it's "gibberish" because you don't like the explanation
Perhaps it's because you don't have the mental capacity to understand it :bpohh:
Under the specific circumstances of a selenhelion eclipse, yeah, it definitely can
You're just mad you can't explain why it can't :bpumad:
Besides, it's only observable if you're in the exact right location on Earth and only for a few minutes to an hour; that doesn't prove flat earth theory to be true
That video does not disprove either heliocentrism or a spherical Earth...try again :bpumad:
Millions of tons of rock pushing up against each otherhow much friction is needed to cause an eruption that lasts for weeks?
Kinda like major landmasses pushing and sliding against each other
Feel free to post another example of light refraction causing an object in the sky to appear almost 180 degrees from its actual positionNow it's "gibberish" because you don't like the explanation
Perhaps it's because you don't have the mental capacity to understand it :bpohh:
Under the specific circumstances of a selenhelion eclipse, yeah, it definitely can
You're just mad you can't explain why it can't :bpumad:
Besides, it's only observable if you're in the exact right location on Earth and only for a few minutes to an hour; that doesn't prove flat earth theory to be true
That video does not disprove either heliocentrism or a spherical Earth...try again :bpumad:
I'll wait
Also @the bold, yes it does. Ask me how
Also, why do you keep ducking that one question about heliocentric theory that I've asked you across multiple threads now?
That's not what a lunar eclipse is.
You're thinking of a solar eclipse.
Solar = Sun > Moon > Earth, casts shadow on earth
Lunar = Sun > Earth > Moon, casts shadow on moon
So yeah, the sun and moon being 180 degrees from each other is actually correct, because we're talking about a lunar eclipse.
Minor in physics at Georgia Tech but be unable to distinguish between solar and lunar eclipses, brehs
What are you talking about???That's not what a lunar eclipse is.
You're thinking of a solar eclipse.
Solar = Sun > Moon > Earth, casts shadow on earth
Lunar = Sun> Earth > Moon, casts shadow on moon
You just said that light refraction explains selenhelion eclipses
I'm asking you to post an example of light refraction causing an object to move from its actual position in the sky
And again, why have you been ducking my other question?
@ocmfII @xCivicx @Hannibal Fox @Dafunkdoc_Unlimited @MMS
whats on the other side of the moon..
and, why do we only see one side of the moon..
Correct, they do
You don't seem to understand what a selenhelion eclipse is.
Light refraction explains why we can see both the sun and moon above the horizon when they're supposed to be in perfect linear alignment during a selenhelion eclipse.
Again, a lunar eclipse is Sun > Earth > Moon, where the Earth casts a shadow on the Moon.
You don't seem to understand that the video you posted is, in itself, an example of what I'm talking about.
Again, a lunar eclipse is Sun > Earth > Moon, where the Earth casts a shadow on the Moon.
If you're arguing that the Moon appears to be 180 degrees across from each other during a lunar eclipse...THAT'S EXACTLY CORRECT.
ONCE AGAIN, as you can CLEARLY SEE in the video I posted, the sun is BELOW THE HORIZON, meaning that the earth should be BLOCKING the majority of the suns light from reaching the moon, according to heliocentric theoryCorrect, they do
You don't seem to understand what a selenhelion eclipse is.
Light refraction explains why we can see both the sun and moon above the horizon when they're supposed to be in perfect linear alignment during a selenhelion eclipse.
Again, a lunar eclipse is Sun > Earth > Moon, where the Earth casts a shadow on the Moon.
ONCE AGAIN, as you can CLEARLY SEE in the video I posted, the BOTTOM of the moon should be shaded, and the TOP of the moon illuminated by the small amount of sun not being blocked by the earth, according to heliocentric theory
ONCE AGAIN, as you can CLEARLY SEE in the video I posted, it's actually the TOP of the moon that shaded and the BOTTOM of the moon that is illuminated, which makes ABSOLUTELY NO SENSE in the heliocentric model, because the earth is supposedly blocking the bottom part of the moon from sunlight
Now that I've destroyed ANOTHER argument of yours, why do you keep ducking my question?
I literally just took a picture of a moon, that was directly over head with the bottom shaded, while the sun was rising in the east on a sunny day..
What does this have to do with the video I posted?
Again, you two are arguing how the moon looks when the earths horizon is blocking the sun reflection off the moon.. Right?
I said, I just seen the bottom part of the moon shaded, when the sun was way above the horizon..
You figure out what that has to do with the video you posted.
