As crazy as this sounds zo before the kidney problems might be just as good if not better than duncan. Injuries to hardaway,mashburn,jones and others killed those teams.and the big men in the east had to deal with thug niccas like oakley,mason and others
I should neg this post. You just rattled off names and I dont think you watched any of them extensively except Duncan and maybe Shaq.Yall really think duncan could handle the likes of admiral,shaq,ewing,zo,daugherty,smits ,mutombo,divac,laimbeer, parish, and thugs like mason,oakley,mcdanials tyrone hill,
of all the dumbfukkery on this forum![]()
They never even faced each other in the playoffs.Easy This nikka->![]()
and this nikka->![]()
duncan would have had 0 titles during that period.
I should neg this post. You just rattled off names and I dont think you watched any of them extensively except Duncan and maybe Shaq.
If Duncan had any type of personality, or "swag," you all would be on his nuts.
This dude argued that Zo was better than Duncan.![]()
In the post, his jumper, on the ball defense, and he is a reliable scorer. The reliable scorer is something Zo never was.It seems absurd but look at the numbers. And if those teams wouldve stayed healthy and won it would be a lot closer than you think. What area of duncans game totally outshine a healthy zo?
Lol I been watching ball since 91.
Shaq did ate Hakeem up tho. Their stats were basically even and that was Shaq in his 2nd year.Could duncan sweep shaq in the finals like hakeem did.? Naw shaq wouldve ate him up.
For all of the people thats acting like Hakeem played at a higher level than Duncan, you're still not saying what Hakeem did better than Duncan.
no point in arguing cats here will pick ANY 80s player over players today
For all of the people thats acting like Hakeem played at a higher level than Duncan, you're still not saying what Hakeem did better than Duncan.