The stupidity in this thread

. Hakeem went almost a decade with an allstar player. The years that he won, there wasn't a single player that made the allstar team. Yes Drexler was an allstar player but he was on the downside when he came to Houston which was why he didnt make the allstar team.
Hakeem was head and shoulders a better defender than Duncan. Yall do realize he is the leader in blocks. Did yall know he is number 8 in steals? There isn't even a another center in the top 50 in steals

. He was a great on ball defender, a great pick and roll defender, and great at causing turnovers as (#1 blocks,#8 steals). Hakeem even had 2 quadruple double games which shows he can do it all.
Hakeem role was always primary scorer, defender, go to player in the 4th. Duncan teams always had well balanced scoring and defending. Duncan is not better than Hakeem in any aspect of the game. Hakeem was better at scoring,rebounding,defense,free throws, and shooting.
Most importantly, Hakeem was a more dominant player than Duncan. Duncan isn't a dominant player, he is just a consistent player. How can you be dominant with only 10 40 point games in your career? Hakeem had 7 40pt games in 1995 alone.
So can someone tell me what did Duncan do better than Hakeem other than play on better teams?