Isiah killin Pippen and Shaq shyttin on Georgetown centers on Open Court

Art Barr

INVADING SOHH CHAMPION
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
68,612
Reputation
13,809
Daps
95,579
Reppin
CHICAGO
I enjoyed the Shaq coach psych session with Ernie.
Shaq's shot at Kenny was fukk'n hilarious.


Art Barr
 
Last edited:

Consumed

Superstar
Joined
May 6, 2015
Messages
5,989
Reputation
1,390
Daps
16,119
That "he makes his teammates better" narrative was at FULL TILT for Nash those years
Actually could get on board with that since he's one of the greatest floor generals ever and the team went from a bottom tier offense to best in the league with his addition. The issue came when people argued he was more valuable to a teams success than Kobe, Dirk or Garnett, which is insane.

Problem I have with Rose/Iverson's narratives is that they were given all the credit for the success of their teams who were "miraculously" winning games despite having little to no talent around them. Little to no mention that the Bulls had one of the best defenses of the modern era + top 2 in rebounding at the time and those 76ers played great D as well. Neither Rose or Iverson were anchors or high impact contributors to the efforts of their respective defenses, who would've still been great without them on the team.

Well, if you agree there exists a narrative that plausibly is written.

Again, like I said,.....
When, it came to ivo.
Ivo was playing out of position and playing in a system where socially he was at odds with the coach.
Plus, a changing of the guard admin wise as well.
With d rose you are talembout an org based and welled in purposeful mediocrity.
Becoming the best team in the league record wise.

So, I don't agree with you being negative towards Ai and rose as MVP.
As, it does not take into account the overall full scope and narrative of the parties involved from the winners to the people passed over.

Art Barr

I don't see how any of that about Iverson has to do with him being the best player in the league though. Not a matter of social/organization issues or being out of position, Shaq was straight up the most dominant player in the game from '00-02 with his only remote competition being Tim Duncan who (arguably) overtook him in '03, not Iverson.

This organization "welled in purposeful mediocrity" fielded one of the best defenses of the modern era of basketball thanks to the brilliance of Tom Thibodeau. You cannot mention the success of that Bulls team without referencing the actual best performing unit on the squad by a huge margin, the defense. Which Rose did not have significant influence over. Unlike LBJ or Dwight who both anchored their respective teams defensively while providing significant offensive impact. Rose had a ton of support on that squad, and its because of that support that he was able to win MVP to begin with (team record). He did a good job taking an otherwise subpar offensive cast and lifting it to slightly above average levels, but he didn't actually lead the best performing unit on the squad so this talk of "carrying" gets ridiculous. You don't win that many games in this league without help. Not even Kobe could do that in '06 & '07, neither could Wade in his peak season '09 or McGrady in '03.

I'm not even being negative about their MVP's here, but saying that if you're going to knock Nash for not being deserving of the award b/c he wasn't the best in the league why not those two? B/c they weren't close to that either. I don't even think Rose was a top 4 player that year.
 

Art Barr

INVADING SOHH CHAMPION
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
68,612
Reputation
13,809
Daps
95,579
Reppin
CHICAGO
Actually could get on board with that since he's one of the greatest floor generals ever and the team went from a bottom tier offense to best in the league with his addition. The issue came when people argued he was more valuable to a teams success than Kobe, Dirk or Garnett, which is insane.

Problem I have with Rose/Iverson's narratives is that they were given all the credit for the success of their teams who were "miraculously" winning games despite having little to no talent around them. Little to no mention that the Bulls had one of the best defenses of the modern era + top 2 in rebounding at the time and those 76ers played great D as well. Neither Rose or Iverson were anchors or high impact contributors to the efforts of their respective defenses, who would've still been great without them on the team.



I don't see how any of that about Iverson has to do with him being the best player in the league though. Not a matter of social/organization issues or being out of position, Shaq was straight up the most dominant player in the game from '00-02 with his only remote competition being Tim Duncan who (arguably) overtook him in '03, not Iverson.

This organization "welled in purposeful mediocrity" fielded one of the best defenses of the modern era of basketball thanks to the brilliance of Tom Thibodeau. You cannot mention the success of that Bulls team without referencing the actual best performing unit on the squad by a huge margin, the defense. Which Rose did not have significant influence over. Unlike LBJ or Dwight who both anchored their respective teams defensively while providing significant offensive impact. Rose had a ton of support on that squad, and its because of that support that he was able to win MVP to begin with (team record). He did a good job taking an otherwise subpar offensive cast and lifting it to slightly above average levels, but he didn't actually lead the best performing unit on the squad so this talk of "carrying" gets ridiculous. You don't win that many games in this league without help. Not even Kobe could do that in '06 & '07, neither could Wade in his peak season '09 or McGrady in '03.

I'm not even being negative about their MVP's here, but saying that if you're going to knock Nash for not being deserving of the award b/c he wasn't the best in the league why not those two? B/c they weren't close to that either. I don't even think Rose was a top 4 player that year.


Give busters more credit than the guy putting wind beneath their sails to have the confidence to execute.
Rose and ivo were the best that year and if they were not there.
There is no other player on that roster who could have helped them be formidable.


Art Barr
 

I.V.

Keep this Fire
Supporter
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
7,056
Reputation
2,220
Daps
17,747
The dirty secret of all this is... Nash was kinda ahead of his time. It happened at the end of his career, so he didn't have the same kind of longevity with big numbers that he should have... but you look at how teams are playing now, offenses being focused from the outside-in, looking to free up as many open 3's as possible... that is BUILT for him. if he entered the league ten years later, he'd have put up massive numbers for a decade.

Steph Curry is obviously a better player... but the style comparison, and the success he's having with his skillset shows that Nash would be doing huge numbers right now, and making dudes furious.

You have to play the game that exists... all of this "who i'd take on the blacktop" shyt is cool... but nba games aren't played on the blacktop. Which is why curry is the best point guard in the world right now, even though a lot of old heads probably think Payton or Zeke or whomever would hand him his ass.
 

LV Koopa

Jester from Hell
Joined
Nov 18, 2014
Messages
9,070
Reputation
1,764
Daps
27,936
Reppin
NYC
Cats love to shyt on Nash and D'Antoni but don't realize they pretty much created the modern league (and Don Nelson too). Usually you can tell who didn't watch shyt in that era by what they say about the Suns and MVPs.

Some real actual knowledge being dropped in here :salute:
 

NormanConnors

Detroit/MSU Spartan Life
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
30,583
Reputation
5,729
Daps
62,862
Reppin
Detroit
Isiah got drafted to the fukking Pistons who were just as bad if not worse than the Bulls team Jordan got drafted to though.

:wow:

No Karl Malone gave him that work...that elbow:mjcry:

:mjcry:

Zeke still wants to see Malone for the fade this day even:manny:, he ethers Pippen and Malone on the Mic any chance he gets. I'm sure if they had either on the panel as a guest fist would fly.
 

mastermind

Rest In Power Kobe
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
64,133
Reputation
6,422
Daps
170,945
The dirty secret of all this is... Nash was kinda ahead of his time. It happened at the end of his career, so he didn't have the same kind of longevity with big numbers that he should have... but you look at how teams are playing now, offenses being focused from the outside-in, looking to free up as many open 3's as possible... that is BUILT for him. if he entered the league ten years later, he'd have put up massive numbers for a decade.

Steph Curry is obviously a better player... but the style comparison, and the success he's having with his skillset shows that Nash would be doing huge numbers right now, and making dudes furious.

You have to play the game that exists... all of this "who i'd take on the blacktop" shyt is cool... but nba games aren't played on the blacktop. Which is why curry is the best point guard in the world right now, even though a lot of old heads probably think Payton or Zeke or whomever would hand him his ass.
The comments by the Open Court guys werent shytting on Nash though.

If anything, it praised how great a guy like Jason Kidd was.
 

Jplaya2023

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
43,234
Reputation
-204
Daps
89,779
has anyone brought up Shaq talking about averaging 28-15 when nash won those 2 mvps :merchant:

in 05 he was still top 5, but 06 he fell off a fukkin cliff

:shaq: "I was still giving them 28-15 when nash stole my mvps"

jplaya " :rudy: " "This nikka lying his ass off and no one saying shyt about it
 

Jplaya2023

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
43,234
Reputation
-204
Daps
89,779
Isiah got drafted to the fukking Pistons who were just as bad if not worse than the Bulls team Jordan got drafted to though.


Very true, Zeke's 1st few years the pistons were run and gun. Chuck Daly came and changed the entire pace and playstyle of the team. They made great draft choices, and good trades and got good talent. the bulls wasted MJs first 3 seasons with players like washed gervin, orlando woolrdige, mustache john paxon, brad sellers etc.. Oakley was a solid pick, but it wasn't until 87 when they traded for pippen and drafted horace did things start to get turned around
 
Top