Really? I'm not sure about the term "full buy-in on socialism" seems a bit loaded. I think the feds and state expanding their lands for this is both necessary and reasonable maybe that's "full buy-in on socialism". It would also be a much better use of government largess than say building a wall on the border and eminent domain cases there imho.
Confiscating private property and dictating its use at the level that would be required for the sort of rural land use transformation you're talking about would certainly be full-blown socialism. You would be talking about a transfer of the means of production from the individual to the government at a scale unprecedented in our nation's established history.
I struggle to see the political will for that sort of massive transformation. And if it did happen...who would control it? Because wealthy politicians in DC don't have all that much more invested in healthy forests than the corporations do, which is a big reason why even Democratic environmental management has been absolute dogshyt in the Clinton and Obama Administrations.
Historically sure Industrialization/The Great Migration if we're talking about previous centuries weren't great for the environment but it's not that simple and you know that.
You didn't read the article - I'm not talking about historically, I'm talking about a process that is continuing NOW. Right now, this very moment, moving forest land out of local control is fukking up the forests environmentally. This article is discussing shifts that are occurring in real time:
Big money bought the forests. Small timber communities are paying the price
The local people want healthy forests because they and their friends hunt on it and need animals to survive. The local people want healthy streams because they and their friends fish them and need fish to survive. The local people want healthy watersheds because their water supply comes from them. The local people want healthy trees because they have to look at them every day.
The corporations who take over that land when the people more out don't care about ANY of that. In the article they don't even call them forests, they call them "tree farms". They don't give a shyt about animals, fish, water, landscape, they're just "farming trees" in the most profit-driven way possible.
With forest land, with farm land, with anything, people care more about that which they know. Absentee landowners simply don't give a shyt the way locals do. Rural people get shyt on for being loggers and farmers, but everyone who has spent time on these issues knows that local rural logging companies take FAR better care of the forests than NYC investment firms; local family farms take FAR better care of their land than mega corporations.
That's like saying Manifest Destiny/Westward Expansion was good for the environment because people moved to more rural places.
People were already there in those places, they were called Native Americans. Your education failed you.
Native Americans took care of the land best because they were the most dependent on the land and most intimately familiar with it. That's not saying that they were perfect, but of course they were better than now. The most stable they were in one place, the better they took care of the land.
When White people moved in, the land suffered because the people were less dependent on the land and less familiar with it. From the very beginning, large landowners could fukk up a tract of land and then move on. They didn't know how to sustain the land because they didn't have 100s of years of experience in the same place, nor did they have generations of children who would depend on it in the future. Their own lives were too separate from the land they were destroying. A small landowner who had been passed down the land through multiple generations and knew what he had to do to take care of it, who had nothing other than the land to pass down to his children and knew they needed to receive it in good shape, did much better.
When people move out, move away from the land, and corporations move in, land use gets worse. That has been true from the moment White people began displacing Native Americans until right now today every time another rural community dies and sells off its landholdings to the highest bidder.