actually I don't, the book was disavowed long time ago
when you have stories like that of NOAH being plagiarized
you can't trust anything else in there
finito caput
Lets discuss problems with the "resurrection" story
- Thread starter ☑︎#VoteDemocrat
- Start date
-
- Tags
- christianity
when you have stories like that of NOAH being plagiarized
you can't trust anything else in there
finito caput
Dafunkdoc_Unlimited
Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
- Messages
- 45,062
- Reputation
- 8,000
- Daps
- 122,429
- Reppin
- The Wrong Side of the Tracks
tmonster said:
No, it wasn't. That's a lie.
no you are lying
Dafunkdoc_Unlimited
Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
- Messages
- 45,062
- Reputation
- 8,000
- Daps
- 122,429
- Reppin
- The Wrong Side of the Tracks
you don't believe in scripture so let me show you some scripture to change your mind brehs
Dafunkdoc_Unlimited
Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
- Messages
- 45,062
- Reputation
- 8,000
- Daps
- 122,429
- Reppin
- The Wrong Side of the Tracks
tmonster said:
Greco-Roman records aren't Scripture. The Talmud isn't Scripture. Archeology isn't Scripture.
Logical fallacies and smileys aren't evidence.
Logical fallacies and smileys aren't evidence.
how the hell does any of that support resurrection?
conflation is not evidence
Dafunkdoc_Unlimited
Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
- Messages
- 45,062
- Reputation
- 8,000
- Daps
- 122,429
- Reppin
- The Wrong Side of the Tracks
tmonster said:
What is the most reasonable explanation for why Jesus' tomb was empty given the evidence contained in historical documents?
Smileys are not arguments.
Smileys are not arguments.
Last edited:
they made it all up and then it was repeatedly plagiarized and repeated until folks like you come along to swallow it up?
that it's all made up is just as plausible as king James rewriting parts in and reediting parts out of the bible or as plausible of any document you have found. their authenticity in questionable and their bias is wholly plausible
the same thing can be said for the best explanation for why Jesus keeps showing up on toast
or stone statues of the virgin Mary has cried blood
the latter two would be taken by the majority as believable lore today, were we not living in this current age of science
and that is where we find ourselves with charlatans trying to give the air of scientific inquiry to the history of their religion when repeatedly they have been caught making shyt up but yet they will ask us to believe the irrelevant and yet so impossible miracle, just this ONE MORE TIME.
Dafunkdoc_Unlimited
Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
- Messages
- 45,062
- Reputation
- 8,000
- Daps
- 122,429
- Reppin
- The Wrong Side of the Tracks
tmonster said:
False. There is no precedent in Greco-Roman/Pagan, Jewish, Egyptian or ANY Ancient Near Eastern literature for a resurrection.
Please provide evidence for your claim of plagiarism.
Please provide evidence for your claim of plagiarism.
My premise has no need for that so
Dafunkdoc_Unlimited
Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
- Messages
- 45,062
- Reputation
- 8,000
- Daps
- 122,429
- Reppin
- The Wrong Side of the Tracks
tmonster said:My premise has no need for that so
Assertions made without evidence...........
look in the mirror young one
Dafunkdoc_Unlimited
Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
- Messages
- 45,062
- Reputation
- 8,000
- Daps
- 122,429
- Reppin
- The Wrong Side of the Tracks
tmonster said:look in the mirror young one
Only one person in this convo has evidence to back up his claims and it isn't you.
only on person in this conversation understands evidence and it isn't you:youthink:Only one person in this convo has evidence and it isn't you.