No, it just doesn't make any sense. I'm being serious. You're trying to argue that perception doesn't matter, while actively trying to change the perception of a person/party in this very thread. You're employing the same propaganda you used in the past that was debunked (the youtube video, the campaign buttons, ignoring party realignment). You tie those [negative] things to that person and it hurts how they're perceived. That works on the highly susceptible. That works on people like you. That works on fickle moderates. The KKK retard understands this, which is why he backed off from endorsing Trump and switched to Clinton. But his lie about donating such an amount fell apart under scrutiny. I mean, we argued this in 2016. The FEC proved it was a lie, but here you are... again. We know how these people operate. I know how you operate.
@88m3 Uncle Grand Dragon of the KKK supports Hilary Clinton - Here's the last thread where this shyt was debunked.
You posted a [irrelevant] Jim Powell opinion piece as if I should care about some Cato Institute talking-head. Again, I don't understand. When I say I know what was at stake, I'm speaking of the supreme court, the lower courts, having a functioning government, net neutrality, climate change, something that's not full of sycophants. I mean, I'm open to you showing me where Obama supported and singed on for Trump to decimate the EPA? Are you suggesting that Obama supported putting a white supremacist at the head of the Justice Department? Did Obama agree to appoint a bunch of unqualified, young racist white males to the lower courts? Are you saying that Obama really wanted Gorsuch in the SC? Show me where this was already done and signed years ago and I'll shut up.
Disagreement is fine if it's rational. You're not a rational person. You bring baseless conspiracy and nothing more.