PartyHeart
All Star
It's two sided. It says something about the men they like and it says something about them as well. Same is true for the reverse. That said, you can't compare female Ls to male Ls because of the different value systems. Men generally get the stuff that women want (quality time, attention, non sexual affection) with there Ls while women generally get the stuff that men want (sex) with their Ls. No guy would consider a one night stand with no call back and L. No girl would consider a guy taking her out and being attentive and thoughtful but wanting to hold off on sex until the right time an L. Most women would prefer the long term relationship to having sex and moving on (at least they proclaim that they would), therefore it would stand to reason that a man looking to engage in such a relationship should have an easier time than a man that just wants to fukk and move on.
Well it takes a huge oversimplification to make that logic work first of all, as you've sort of noted. But the idea that women are always looking for a relationship begins once we are of dating age and never ends. Does that mean each time a woman gets into a relationship and it doesn't last forever the man has taken an L? Just because women are "supposed" to want that and therefore if she ever turns one down or ends one, he's losing? No. That doesn't even make sense. A relationship not working out isn't an L, its life. And there are many, many, many factors that can make a relationship not palatable to one or both parties involved or make a relationship go sour. There are far fewer factors that can make a random sex session sour. So the equivalency that poster and you are attempting to draw is not apples to apples.
. A lot of guys are convinced that this is the way to go. It's up to guys who know to put them up on game. It's up to them to listen. And it's up to chicks to keep it 100% and stop leading them on/using them.
