HUH???The Gov't might as well be much more generous with grants to students and schools (with the express designation of cutting tuition, not going to staff raises etc.
Look. We gotta see all actors in a field as being COMPLETELY in their own self interest.
So when you say that, you're TRUSTING that both parties would agree to this.
The only way this WONT happen is with explicit and tightly regulated law prohibiting these things.
This currently isn't in place.
Most loans give you 6 months to 9 months post your last semester of loans...thats not something to really blink at. How long do you think the grace period should be? I'm not saying its perfect, but its a loan, not a grant.and in, at the very least, quantity out-putted, not necessarily amount per)...and colleges should be more lenient on payment programs (most of which have a very short time period).
Also, leniency doesn't change what you OWE.
What sort of voodoo is this?Less loans will be needed then and colleges would have an incentive to lower prices because they will have fewer bad accounts receivable.

Even if I wanted you to convince me, this sort of hand-waving couch-QB level economics makes no sense to me. Most colleges barely grant the loans themselves cause its the feds who issue the money most of the time, not the colleges.
Colleges/Unis incentive to lower costs is NOT there if students aren't strapped to guaranteed loan money.