One and Done is about to be overturned pre Woj

SchoolboyC

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 27, 2014
Messages
25,348
Reputation
4,805
Daps
107,904
five of them aren't first rounders, we're talking 2-5 across the whole draft, and it is inconsequential to the entire pool of students/players who are potential draft prospects. and yes, the NCAA is inherently tied to this, people are clamoring for kids to go straight to the NBA when there are 0-5 per year who would be able to do so, while there are at least a hundred who'd be better served if the people used that same energy to push for the g-league or some other paid league to be the bridge to NBA...kids would be paid, develop better in the face of playing stiffer competition, etc.

"one and done" is easily the tip of what's wrong with the system, i don't see it as a victory, it's a bullshyt consolation prize that pretty much protects the status quo

There's a little under 40 players who have declared for the draft after being one year removed from high school. This isn't 2002. I'm not sure what makes you think only a handful of players will declare directly out of HS.
 

Left.A1

Superstar
Joined
Dec 19, 2017
Messages
22,600
Reputation
1,370
Daps
61,038
five of them aren't first rounders, we're talking 2-5 across the whole draft, and it is inconsequential to the entire pool of students/players who are potential draft prospects. and yes, the NCAA is inherently tied to this, people are clamoring for kids to go straight to the NBA when there are 0-5 per year who would be able to do so, while there are at least a hundred who'd be better served if the people used that same energy to push for the g-league or some other paid league to be the bridge to NBA...kids would be paid, develop better in the face of playing stiffer competition, etc.

"one and done" is easily the tip of what's wrong with the system, i don't see it as a victory, it's a bullshyt consolation prize that pretty much protects the status quo
2004 there were 8 first round high school picks :yeshrug:



I don’t really get what you’re railing against here tho tbh ... there already IS a G leauge and if they get rid of one year removed from highschool/19 and older to enter the NBA draft provision that means you will NOW have the choice to skip college and go straight to the Gleauge ...

I guess your upset that the NBA doesn’t get rid of the NCAAs collegiate sports system do I have that correct? If so I don’t really understand that stance as even in baseball where there is a fully integrated minor league most of the players still decide to go to college ...the NBA can’t wave there hand and remove college sports :yeshrug:
 

young yeesh

All Star
Joined
Oct 19, 2017
Messages
1,607
Reputation
402
Daps
4,652
if this came after that wack ass natty last year (the one this year wasnt much better seeing Nova slap Michigan's cheeks), it would've been a terrible look.
u ain’t had to phrase it like that :damecoffee:
 

Street Knowledge

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
27,786
Reputation
2,708
Daps
67,063
Reppin
NYC
exploitation is the american way

it's better around the world where franchises compete to bring the best offers to the top talent

kill the draft

*

The entire reason the draft exists(and this is the case for all sports) is because the owners don’t want the top young amateur talent competing in a true free market having them bid against each other for their services. The draft is a way of limiting bargaining and negotiating power.

The whole “Well you know this is about parity and fairness” is revionist history that they added on decades later
 

threattonature

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
25,687
Reputation
4,387
Daps
83,335
five of them aren't first rounders, we're talking 2-5 across the whole draft, and it is inconsequential to the entire pool of students/players who are potential draft prospects. and yes, the NCAA is inherently tied to this, people are clamoring for kids to go straight to the NBA when there are 0-5 per year who would be able to do so, while there are at least a hundred who'd be better served if the people used that same energy to push for the g-league or some other paid league to be the bridge to NBA...kids would be paid, develop better in the face of playing stiffer competition, etc.

"one and done" is easily the tip of what's wrong with the system, i don't see it as a victory, it's a bullshyt consolation prize that pretty much protects the status quo
As time went on teams got more and more comfortable with drafting high school players and by this point I think the stigma is completely gone. I wouldn't be surprised to see half the first round being high schoolers if they remove the one and done. Especially after they changed the collective bargaining so that you get basically 8 years for cheap for drafted players. But like you said there'd still be plenty of players that would still be going through the NCAA and feeding the system so it wouldn't solve everything.
 

dora_da_destroyer

Master Baker
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
66,888
Reputation
17,290
Daps
275,895
Reppin
Oakland
There's a little under 40 players who have declared for the draft after being one year removed from high school. This isn't 2002. I'm not sure what makes you think only a handful of players will declare directly out of HS.
it's not declaring, it's getting drafted....i'm sure more HS players declared than were drafted back in the day as well. again, this addresses a very select few, those vs. a larger population that would thrive in a semi pro/jr league who are left to slave away for the NCAA. yall are missing the point, i have no issue with this rule being removed, but it's not the bigger issue. people are happy with the scraps, that's cool. i still see the bigger problem and feel it should be addressed.
As time went on teams got more and more comfortable with drafting high school players and by this point I think the stigma is completely gone. I wouldn't be surprised to see half the first round being high schoolers if they remove the one and done. Especially after they changed the collective bargaining so that you get basically 8 years for cheap for drafted players. But like you said there'd still be plenty of players that would still be going through the NCAA and feeding the system so it wouldn't solve everything.
i could see more HS players being drafted currently due to the focus on guard play, but will they be able to hit the 3's people are counting on from guard play? what happens if/when the league shifts back to the front court?

but yea, either way, NCAA is still the free farm system, and people aren't doing enough to change that. that's my issue.
 

010101

C L O N E*0690//////
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
87,267
Reputation
21,755
Daps
231,131
Reppin
uptXwn***///***///
The entire reason the draft exists(and this is the case for all sports) is because the owners don’t want the top young amateur talent competing in a true free market having them bid against each other for their services. The draft is a way of limiting bargaining and negotiating power.

The whole “Well you know this is about parity and fairness” is revionist history that they added on decades later
100% like i said murican exploitation*
 

tremonthustler1

aka bx_representer
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
87,834
Reputation
10,222
Daps
218,502
Reppin
My Pops Forever RIP
G League games can even become more profitable if the NBA marketed it and had young stars in the league developing. It might take 5-7 years to do all this but it needs to be set in motion because a farm league to develop young players is what is missing in the NBA and could benefit the league tremendously like it does for the NHL, MLB, Soccer.
Marketing minor league hoops is fruitless
 
Top