I wouldn't say that about Insane Clown Posse, either...
...but that's not the point.
My point is, there are dozens of ill MCs that are lyrically top notch...but what have they done with those
"top notch skills"? What do they have to show for them? That's the crux of this argument.
You shoot yourself in the foot by comparing MCs with nothing to show for their skills to MCs who do have
something to show for their efforts. You can't take those things away from them...
I'm not trying to "reach" for accomplishment - that's the gottdamn topic. LOL
Finally.
Okay - Big L made a record that is considered by many to be a classic.
That takes work, and it is a tangible evidence to support a claim that a rapper is top-notch.
If that's true, then that is an "accomplishment", and a "contribution".
Now that's ONE. So, if he's compared to another rapper or group who has TWO "accomplishments" or "contributions",
can't you argue that the rapper group with TWO such accomplishments is more "accomplished" than Big L is?
That's my whole point here.
...But you KNOW it's not. You KNOW that.
You mean "one of these people", like rappers? LOL
The reason we know that Grammys and Plaques (and clout, and money, and who has the biggest chain) are important in the game is because the rappers tell us their damn selves.
- EPMD boasted about going gold in 30 days 20 years ago because they thought it was an accomplishment.
- Will Smith was mad about not getting to be on TV getting his Grammy. You tellin' me that wasn't important to him?
- I was bumpin' the first LOX album yesterday, and as you know the title is Money, Power, & Respect.
On the interview on that album, they said they had respect, and a little bit of power, but they were broke and now they
wanted the money. That should tell you that the beats and rhymes aren't all that matters.