historically the most powerful console has almost never been the best selling console. The power difference is fuel for fanboy wars on the internet. the common consumer doesn't really perceive it like the guys who argue online about this stuff. The Xbox One is in the ballpark of a PS4 and passes the looks good enough threshold. This isn't like the Wii vs the Xbox 360 or PS3. Its not that drastic a difference.
What I'm saying is Microsoft is in this position because they thought they could dictate to the market things like DRM and Kinect being mandatory. They pissed off a lot of their fans. We're in the early adapter phase right now and the market is far more sensitive to stuff like that. Not because their box has extra functionality the competition doesn't.
And historically, the most powerful console wasn't cheaper and entered the market at the same time as it's direct competitor. History also showed that the first console to 10 milli usually wins a generation...how'd that play out for MS?





at all the paragraphs rekkaclown out here writing to defend waitstation.