So reading "The destruction of Black Civilization" and #hoh come get this L

[Dzali OG]

Pardon me but what's "HOH" ?

Hard on hoes.

 

[Jazzy B.]

My post just went right over your head

Designed by WHO?

You rambled about nonsense

@ you thinking a Mixed/race Biracial will value "truth" over a come-up in a White structural society. Just complete delusion as history has repeatedly shown (which you've unsurprisingly ignored). White People have no problem using Mixed Race/Biracial as a buffer against Black People. But most importantly Biracials/Mixed Race have absolutely no problem with playing this role (Being Superior to and above Blacks). They'll complain about being treated badly by White People and the same as Black People, but won't dare to open their mouths about how due to them being Mixed Race automatically puts them above Black People in almost every sector in White and Black society in a White structural society. Which of course leads to self-hatred with actual Black People, where you have Black Men and Women wanting mixed and Light babies, wanting to bleach their skin, wanting Mixed people to represent them etc. In turn "Whitening". Then they have the nerve to associate with and call themselves "Black" FOH

 

[Jazzy B.]

i suspect the ones going the hardest for IR already have a couple of mixed breeds running around. they're attempting to rationalize it even though they know they fukked up royally by producing half white kids. cognitive dissonance i guess

Always the case word to @Gravity

 

[EndDomination]

He overly examined race in the book, and drastically under-examined social stratification, developmental models based on environment, technological advances based on region, etc.
Definitely a good book, but if you have the concentration to get through it there are about 100 supplementary works you need to get through.
The fact that he writes of the "African race" by itself is the Whitest Afrocentric concept conceivable, and only something an out-of-touch AA man would think of.

 

[ridedolo]

He overly examined race in the book, and drastically under-examined social stratification, developmental models based on environment, technological advances based on region, etc.
Definitely a good book, but if you have the concentration to get through it there are about 100 supplementary works you need to get through.
The fact that he writes of the "African race" by itself is the Whitest Afrocentric concept conceivable, and only something an out-of-touch AA man would think of.

says the 20 year old college student. ya'll kill me on here.

 

[Free White & 21]

nikka, I love the dark skin of chocolate on my women, the most, so miss me with that bullshyt.

But, yes I will fukk a white chick or any other chick, I'm the BLACK MAN, my dikk can go wherever it please. My people, and Myself, went through some shyt, so if I do choose to get with a white chick, and give her my "the shyt" seed, i can do it. AND WHAT?

Ain't no self hate on this side, nikka, but I'm not stupid, shyt happens. I ain't the only black man in this world, so I gave a strategy for them.

Now get off the nuts, Please

This thirsty nikka went full bedbuck

 

[EndDomination]

No mixing alone didn't do it, but it played a major part.

That's the thing, it didn't.
Not by a long-shot. Environmental factors, economic factors, pure warfare, epidemics, technological advancements of enemies, and eventually changed dynasties and slow but sure colonialism is what did it.
Mixing isn't even on the plate of reasons behind the destruction of some of East/North Africa's civilizations.
Implying it did is a complete misread of the book, as well as history as a whole.

 

[EndDomination]

says the 20 year old college student. ya'll kill me on here.

If you have to run to my age instead of point out where I was incorrect, then you've sufficiently disproven whatever you're asserting.
Either you don't know shyt about Africa (which is obvious) and you're grandstanding on a forum for some real reason, or you actually believe assertions of race-mixing being a large factor in the destruction of Black civilizations in North/East Africa
Either way

 

[Jazzy B.]

nikka, I love the dark skin of chocolate on my women, the most, so miss me with that bullshyt.

But, yes I will fukk a white chick or any other chick, I'm the BLACK MAN, my dikk can go wherever it please. My people, and Myself, went through some shyt, so if I do choose to get with a white chick, and give her my "the shyt" seed, i can do it. AND WHAT?

Ain't no self hate on this side, nikka, but I'm not stupid, shyt happens. I ain't the only black man in this world, so I gave a strategy for them.

Now get off the nuts, Please

How the hell did I miss this bullshyt post?

 

[ridedolo]

If you have to run to my age instead of point out where I was incorrect, then you've sufficiently disproven whatever you're asserting.
Either you don't know shyt about Africa (which is obvious) and you're grandstanding on a forum for some real reason, or you actually believe assertions of race-mixing being a large factor in the destruction of Black civilizations in North/East Africa
Either way

says the 20 year old college student. ya'll kill me on here.

 

[Vashti]

Some of yall are crazy as hell.

No one should have to convince you that diluting your blood is a stupid thing to do. Just admit that you love white flesh and keep it moving.

 

[EndDomination]

Hmm the history of Black people in Brazil, Uruguay and Argentina tell me that it IS a threat.

Brazil's Black people are under subjugation because they were enslaved in the state, and once chattel slavery ended, they were trapped in near-slave conditions in extractive industries, segregated socially and economically from the Whites and criollos who had represented the wealthiest classes since Portugal's invasion. There were no attempts to mitigate the result, the struggles of the Black Brazilan peoples in the favelas is largely ignored because of Brazil's attempt at "post-racialisation" and "we are all Brazilian" propaganda.
The same for Argentina, though they also carried out a direct anti-Black genocide.
Uruguay is also similiar to the US, segregation, social and economic for Afro-Uruguayans, attempts at "post-racialisation" by the government to cover up the mass inequalities, they weren't even recognised as existing as a seperate group until the year I was born.

 

[EndDomination]

says the 20 year old college student. ya'll kill me on here.

You say it like its an insult
"This young Black poster that knows more about Black history than me is getting his education, haha"

 

[SmokyQuartz]

you're really downplaying the rape that these cac b*stards inflicted on black women throughout slavery? negged

@BmoreGorilla keep your eye on this one...

I already got my pics and twitter page up so nice try tho . This is what i mean about the deflections you can't dispute anything i said so you just cry RAPE and CAC like that proves anything. By the way you are one of the most hating BM posters on this site so if anybody a cac

Oh so you not responding come get this L nikka. I betta not hear not one more noun or verb from you fake ass weirdo goof

 

[EndDomination]

I was going to neg you for this but I won't.

You can't label a scholarship someone dedicated almost 30years of his life to do with his resources as "outdated" and "ludicrous", especially when you can't dispute the claims.

The mulatto problems that ruined Egypt and the Moors also happened in South Africa with color reds. And I bet you don't know that most of the middle men during slavery were also mulattos cuz they could speak both languages.

Also when you look at African history and how the whole continent was conquered and subjugated, the colonists used a lot of Africans recruited into their armies to wage wars and subjugate Africans and a lot of these folks were mulattos.

The mulatto problem is real.

The bolded is untrue.

Put it like this, what do you think a Arab is? They are asian whites mixed with Africans for the most part.

Of course we looked down on them, we looked down on everyone. It's our arrogance that we still have.

This is entirely untrue, Arabs are genetically different from Asian and Africans (continental grouping is a really poor way to describe peoples) they look phenotypically similar to the two groups, but they are not genetic mixes of the two groups.