Oh so you not respondingcome get this L nikka. I betta not hear not one more noun or verb from you fake ass weirdo goof
![]()

lol at calling someone a fake ass weirdo goof.
Oh so you not respondingcome get this L nikka. I betta not hear not one more noun or verb from you fake ass weirdo goof
![]()
That's the thing, it didn't.
Not by a long-shot. Environmental factors, economic factors, pure warfare, epidemics, technological advancements of enemies, and eventually changed dynasties and slow but sure colonialism is what did it.
Mixing isn't even on the plate of reasons behind the destruction of some of East/North Africa's civilizations.
Implying it did is a complete misread of the book, as well as history as a whole.
But you do now and still got nothing to say fukk boyi didnt even see your garbage ass post. lol at me hating bm. that's a new one.
lol at calling someone a fake ass weirdo goof.who the fukk are these people im posting with.
But you do now and still got nothing to say fukk boy.
![]()
See, we see the world different, based on life experiencesThis thirsty nikka went full bedbuck![]()
I wouldn't know how a cac post since you know......... i'm not one. But you seem like an expertyou post like a cac![]()
![]()
nikka if you don't get your bedbuckin ass all the way the fukk up outta here![]()
The bolded is untrue.
This is entirely untrue, Arabs are genetically different from Asian and Africans (continental grouping is a really poor way to describe peoples) they look phenotypically similar to the two groups, but they are not genetic mixes of the two groups.
Only bitter men who were cheated on and can't get over it or our extremely entitled virgins who stalk women on instagram believe in this hoh shyt.
Success in our community starts at home with FAMILY!
Eh when it came to Egypt and Ethiopia he put alot of emphasis on race. However when he delved into the Kongo,Nigeria,Angola etc he said the cause of their destruction was desertification, social stratification and constant tribal warfare and lack of military tech advancement. It is enfuriating that with all the mineral resources Africa has that many it got surpassed by neighboring empires in military tech.He overly examined race in the book, and drastically under-examined social stratification, developmental models based on environment, technological advances based on region, etc.
Definitely a good book, but if you have the concentration to get through it there are about 100 supplementary works you need to get through.
The fact that he writes of the "African race" by itself is the Whitest Afrocentric concept conceivable, and only something an out-of-touch AA man would think of.
I definitely agree with that portion of the book, but he was "overemphasizing" race as a factor in the Egyptian and Ethiopian cases, hence this thread which is attempting to assert issues of interracial marriage as bigger issues, or issues equal to "actual" problems the Black community faces today like the school-prison pipeline and subsequent mass-incarceration, massive gang violence, generational poverty with roots in chattel slavery, lower-education issues, environmental issues (like in Flint, Atlanta, Baltimore, etc.)Eh when it came to Egypt and Ethiopia he put alot of emphasis on race. However when he delved into the Kongo,Nigeria,Angola etc he said the cause of their destruction was desertification, social stratification and constant tribal warfare and lack of military tech advancement. It is enfuriating that with all the mineral resources Africa has that many it got surpassed by neighboring empires in military tech.