So What Exactly is Wrong with "Social Justice"?

Berniewood Hogan

IT'S BERNIE SANDERS WITH A STEEL CHAIR!
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
17,983
Reputation
6,800
Daps
88,335
Reppin
nWg
COlgWKLUyBp3G.webp
 

Alpha Male

Spare me your daps
Joined
Feb 2, 2014
Messages
2,264
Reputation
-2,281
Daps
5,317
Why are you so threatened by the idea of women feeling they have something they want to discuss?

You want to be asked if they can protest?

What are they protesting and what do they want to discuss. It's a very simple question.
 

Kenny West

Veteran
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
25,406
Reputation
6,341
Daps
94,048
Reppin
NULL
-Identity politics diluting attention to legitimate issues (catcalling vs police brutality vs transexual support vs black men are trash feminist = BLM)

-SJW being mainly frauds and most "twitter backlash" situations are just people commenting on a trending topic but not being truly invested in the issue (Flint water crisis)

-People who chime and demand things with no realistic plans or intention to execute. In otherwords SJW tend to be people who complain just to complain and don't have any intent to see through the stuff they harp on. (Privilege arguments, demand handouts that can't be reasonably made)


-As a man, I don't respect the reinforced victim mentalities of these groups. Way too much group hugs and apologists way too little fixing.

-SJW are mainly moral grandstanders and don't care nor are invested in actual politics

- SJW are only invested in things that they are triggered by or are opposed to but don't really stand for anything on their own. Or what they do stand for is nebulous concepts. "I support gay rights" "what right are you advocating for?" "........" Basically these people exist to chastise and nothing else.

- Many SJW topics are rooted in pusedoscience and bs social concepts that are good for commenting on online in one off tweets/posts but can't logically unpack. (cultural appropriation, privilege)

- Continuing the above, the reactive ADD nature of how SJW move makes controlled narratives easier. (Ferguson/BLM, NYC catcalling video, fake outrage)

-Outside of calling out discrimination, the labeling is corny. When people can't logically refute an opposing arguement the dodge it by summing it up with a label. Consider it the mainstream white american version of coli's "W-w-well you're a c00n!"
 
Last edited:

the cac mamba

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
111,852
Reputation
14,290
Daps
316,978
Reppin
NULL
you being a naive moron
im gonna take a stab at what the fukk you're talking about, but i meant at a mainstream level? of course there are people in this country who dont think everyone should have equal rights. i thought both of those things were rhetorical

let me know if you have a direct question
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,331
Reputation
19,940
Daps
204,108
Reppin
the ether
what is social justice exactly?
still waiting for this........

You know what "justice" is, right? You could tell what is or is not justice for an individual, right?

Social justice warriors are people who want justice for large social groups who they believe aren't getting it.

It's not that hard.



dont "SJW"'s kinda get clowned because they pick and choose issues? i.e. this week it's bruce jenner pissing here, next week pissing there :mjlol: that kinda shyt?

That's an idiotbox criticism. Who is the particular person who is picking and choosing issues...or are you just taking anything you see on TV and then attributing all their different individual campaigns to some collective group think?

The conservatives mocking people who care about social justice do the same thing. This week it's Planned Parenthood, next week it's emails, next week it's bathrooms, next week it's gun control, and so on.
 

ghostwriterx

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
6,890
Reputation
811
Daps
14,583
It's a disgusting story but i don't see how it's indicituve of larger crisis facing the female collective.

I suspect you don't WANT to see how it's indicative of a larger crisis. There's a wealth of information available, historical record and current research. Sounds like you're either ignorant of or dismissive of this. At any rate, not sure there's much to be gained by engaging further but, I'll ask you this:

Surely we can agree that women were historically oppressed in this country no?
If so when exactly do you think this oppression ceased to exist?
 

ghostwriterx

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
6,890
Reputation
811
Daps
14,583
im gonna take a stab at what the fukk you're talking about, but i meant at a mainstream level? of course there are people in this country who dont think everyone should have equal rights. i thought both of those things were rhetorical

let me know if you have a direct question
:mjpls:
 

the cac mamba

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
111,852
Reputation
14,290
Daps
316,978
Reppin
NULL
You know what "justice" is, right? You could tell what is or is not justice for an individual, right?

Social justice warriors are people who want justice for large social groups who they believe aren't getting it.

It's not that hard.
.
ok. well i think this post addressed it pretty well, actually

-Identity politics diluting attention to legitimate issues (catcalling vs police brutality vs transexual support vs black men are trash feminist = BLM)

-SJW being mainly frauds and most "twitter backlash" situations are just people commenting on a trending topic but not being truly invested in the issue (Flint water crisis)

-People who chime and demand things with no realistic plans or intention to execute. In otherwords SJW tend to be people who complain just to complain and don't have any intent to see through the stuff they harp on. (Privilege arguments, demand handouts that can't be reasonably made)


-As a man, I don't respect the reinforced victim mentalities of these groups. Way too much group hugs and apologists way too little fixing.

-SJW are mainly moral grandstanders and don't care nor are invested in actual politics

- SJW are only invested in things that they are triggered by or are opposed to but don't really stand for anything on their own. Or what they do stand for is nebulous concepts. "I support gay rights" "what right are you advocating for?" "........" Basically these people exist to chastise and nothing else.

- Many SJW topics are rooted in pusedoscience and bs social concepts that are good for commenting on online in one off tweets/posts but can't logically unpack. (cultural appropriation, privilege)

- Continuing the above, the reactive ADD nature of how SJW move makes controlled narratives easier. (Ferguson/BLM, NYC catcalling video, fake outrage)
you can criticize the lena dunham clowns while also believing in 'social justice' :yeshrug: no?

and going off your definitions, i think i only draw it at trannies. and its not even the trannies themselves, they can do what they want. but the fact that they think they can tell people to "accept the fact" that they're women, or else you're "transphobic" :camby:

remember that tranny 15 year old with a tv show who was like "how come boys dont like me :mjcry:"? he doesnt get social justice :mjlol:
 
Top