My partners brother hosea cats was at the trial we saw the little mark ass nikka looking hes fake as fukk.
You cant pick and choose when you q G you either are or you arent and he isnt.
Tip said "this guy _______ is the guy who shot Philant"? Or he incriminated your man's with a description?
He did? I saw some trial footage too, i don't remember him fingering anyone. (I'm in Cincinnati too)
I was in prison when all this shyt with Tip went down but I remember their being mixed emotions. It's interesting to hear mixed reactions from Cincy brothers too...
I never thought he snitched, because my understanding is he never fingered anybody. The average internet cat doesn't understand criminal law, in high profile or complex cases in can be a game of chess, others are very open and shut....Tip's case always appeared to be chess---->he was snitched on by his mule. It would be very easy to argue, and I thought he did, that he didn't know who the mule was buying from...
When you can afford the type of defense he had and have the backing of high profile support, this isn't hard. This isn't difficult if you are a regular guy who can present reasonable doubt with an attorney with something to prove. So I never bought into Tip as a snitch, and there's never been anything concrete to back it up, just a bunch of flimsy accusations...
My position would change if someone could support that he either explicitly identified the Cincy guy, or incriminated the Cincy guy via description; or in the gun case, if he spoke on the plug...
Outside of that, I have a pretty intimate understanding of criminal law, from a defendant's perspective. Unless those things can be established, I don't consider Tip a snitch...