David_TheMan
Veteran
Meltzer has driven the narrative that a good work rate = you deserve to be champion
It's just not true. The idea that in 97 Jericho or Eddy or anyone like that was being buried in favor of "lesser" workers is ridiculous. Why the fukk would you give Malenko the belt over fukking Goldberg or Hogan then.
We romanticize the cruiserweights, they got 4.5 stars regularly, yes they are good workers....watch a 97 nitro..they got CDQ outside of a high spot and the finish. Same as now.
The difference is, meltzer rates these matches and people think "they're killing it, make Johnny wrestling champ TODAY" it's crazy.
Yep its some weird ass fixation meltzer and these smarks have for titles and shyt, like it means someone earned something or like its the cookie that you reward someone with. It means nothing at all, its just a prop, or narrative hook to get people to buy into what you are selling story wise.