This thread is a perfect reason why Kobe HAD to "run Shaq out of town." Had he not, these clowns would have ran with the narrative that Kobe couldnt win without Shaq
Any Laker fan that is honest with themselves, will tell you that Shaq was the best player on the team. But to pretend that Kobe was a "sidekick" IS diminishing his impact. Who got the ball at the end of the game? You telling me if the Bulls down two, they're going to Scottie over Michael? Of course not. Yet the Lakers were going to Kobe over Shaq. So to pretend that he was a "sidekick" is being disingenuous. It was 1A and1B which hardly constitutes a "sidekick" role for the 1B.
YUP...BUT KOBE WAS ALREADY A BETTER ALL AROUND PLAYER BY 2001. SHAQ SIMPLY HAD SENIORITY. BUT EVEN SHAQ DECLARED KOBE "THE BEST PLAYER ON THE PLANET" DURIN THE 2001 PLAYOFFS. SHAQ NOT THE TYPE TO GO OUT HIS WAY TO SAY THAT EITHER.
He always says wild shyt to keep the ante high...what's the matter with you?

