These Draymond stats tho

Jalether

Superstar
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
11,480
Reputation
2,263
Daps
43,366
Nah, they were literally a superTEAM, that was the point. They went 12 deep with contributors. Y'all think a super team is only when a team has three Hall of Famers or something and the rest of the roster is bunk.

stop it, that team had Harrison barnes as starter and bums like festus ezeli,mo sleights etc coming off the bench.

This years lakers bench has players better than some of the players starting for the 2016 "superteam" warriors:mjlol:

That gsw team was a classic case of a whole is greater than sum of its parts.
They overachieved big time.
 

mastermind

Rest In Power Kobe
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
65,094
Reputation
6,479
Daps
174,027
Draymond once averaged in the high teens so for him to regress this much should mean something. Wallace never was a double figure scorer so why should we have criticized him for something he never showed the ability to do.
Draymond average 14 ppg for one season, so idk where this "high teens" stuff came from, and he is not a career 14 ppg scorer.

And what I said earlier is he was, and still is for many nights, a game-changer defensively. He is a better player than Ben Wallace, especially on the offensive end, yet people went crazy over Wallace while shytting on Draymond.
 

NatiboyB

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
65,185
Reputation
3,905
Daps
103,563
Draymond once averaged in the high teens so for him to regress this much should mean something. Wallace never was a double figure scorer so why should we have criticized him for something he never showed the ability to do.

exactly they leave out the fact that draymond at one point did score about 12-13 points...He's never been much of a threat but I have never seen people stan a 5pt 5rb 7ast guy even if he did play damn good team defense.

Ben Wallace was a more dominant defender and rebounder...Ben averaged more rebounds than Draymond does points.
 

x-factor7

Superstar
Joined
May 22, 2012
Messages
4,063
Reputation
935
Daps
15,715
Reppin
Detroit
The 73 win team, if Draymond was open he'd hit the shot (in fact all their role players did). That shyt stopped when KD came aboard, don't know if he lost confidence in his shot, but since then it seems like its an automatic miss. You'd think with no KD or Klay, his points would go up. He should be able to get to 10ppg if he could ever fix his shot.
 

ALonelyDad

Veteran
Joined
Jan 20, 2015
Messages
79,041
Reputation
9,839
Daps
348,033
Still has a good impact moving the ball and defense but yeah those #s are not worth that contract. His 2016 year was probably his best year offensively
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,331
Reputation
19,930
Daps
204,101
Reppin
the ether
Dray gotta be the only breh in the league who can put up absolutely garbage numbers and still have a legion of fans saying trash like “stats don’t tell the whole story!”, “intangibles!”, etc.

Is there anyone else in league history who gets this much praise for putting up this little numbers?

those two were never multiple time all stars and DPOY.
Draymond's stat lines were better when he was making all-star teams. And I'm not sure why y'all think DPOY should have anything to do with a stat line at all.

But yeah, a DPOY-level big who acts as his team's main distributor but doesn't score much is a unique role in bball, Draymond is the only one I can think of. His numbers in his best four years ain't that far off what we've seen from some other all-stars though.

12-8-4 (not an all-star year)
14-10-7
10-8-7
11-8-7

Throw in 1.5 steals and 1.5 blocks a game, a DPOY and two DPOY runner-ups, that ain't bad at all. I'd rather take that then a guy averaging 18-2-6 on bad shooting #'s with no defense.

Compare it to these:

12-6-9
14-7-10
15-7-10

13-8-9
11-8-10
10-6-9

Those were Jason Kidd's numbers in 1998, 2000, 2002, 2006, 2008, and 2010. Those #'s ain't very different from the numbers that Draymond puts up, plus Draymond is more impactful on the defensive end. Not only did Jason Kidd make the All-Star all 6 of those years, he made 1st-team All-NBA in both of the bolded years and actually finished #2 in MVP voting in 2002 with that 15-7-10 line. And Kidd shot 39% that year and 32% from three.
 

Reggie

Veteran
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
91,746
Reputation
5,044
Daps
193,733
Reppin
Virginia
Draymond average 14 ppg for one season, so idk where this "high teens" stuff came from, and he is not a career 14 ppg scorer.

And what I said earlier is he was, and still is for many nights, a game-changer defensively. He is a better player than Ben Wallace, especially on the offensive end, yet people went crazy over Wallace while shytting on Draymond.
Ok so he averaged 14. Still double what Ben averaged who never was known for offense. Ben was a 4 time DPOY so i don't know how much better he was on that end. More versatile? Yeah. But don't act like Ben wasn't the fulcrum of that Detroit team just like Draymond with the Warriors.
 

Elim Garak

Veteran
Joined
Mar 8, 2015
Messages
43,931
Reputation
8,558
Daps
215,982
They started playing better as soon as he returned his numbers are trash but he impacts the game.
 

FAH1223

Go Wizards, Go Terps, Go Packers!
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
79,352
Reputation
9,864
Daps
235,763
Reppin
WASHINGTON, DC
hows that PER looking tho :sas2:

His PER is only 8.8 right now :damn:

Why doesn't he shoot the ball more? Seriously? I watch GSW games and he stays overpassing when he can float it or lay it in. FG% in the 35% range so far this year. 38% last year :scust:

And yes, they are better defensively with him in the game. But he needs to be giving you a bit more offensively
 
Top