TIME MAGAZINE GOING IN ON TIDAL

[philmonroe]

Time magazine is so fukking stupid if they did their homework they would know the company is not "owned" by jay-z he only owns 3% meanwhile a white company put up the majority of the funds... Why don't time magazine report of them bytches too. Or you just wanna hide behind your *mutual group financial title...

Bottom line this service sucks because they making people pay for it and like sheep they will be in denial, bargain within themselves and be weak bytches and buy into they hype... Ya know, apple, beats, BMW, Jordan's, Xbox one... Because people are stupid and follow others they lack the sight to be original...

Nothings original Mr Don't follow the trends man. We all do to some extent including you so stop acting as if you don't.

 

[SleezyBigSlim]

Jay-Z decided to just be honest and say artist need more money, when he should've just told these caca what they wanted to hear
"Here's our great new streaming service you should tryit" Jay you know you then

 

[King Kreole]

Lay of the drugs the examples you used are mainly popular because of celebrity endorsements and popularity instead of tech. What was you on when you thought otherwise? Hell I love Apple and Beats and have both of them but lets not act like them being the popular cool things don't have a lot to do with them being the shyt. A lot of people say both brands aren't good as the competition but its the tech that's making them hot? Yeah you on the good good.

What celebrities are signed on to endorse Apple?

 

[dora_da_destroyer]

So where is the backlash when Jimmy Iovine sells 300 dollar 50 dollar headphones with Dre pushing them???? Where is the backlash wit Apple and their expensive ass products. You are getting good quality sounding music not available anywhere and why all the fuss??? People complained about netflix jumping what 3 dollars.


Shut up

we're really gonna act like there hasn't been backlash over beats? there is backlash against apple selling over priced products as well...anytime someone or some company makes a pure profit play and/or makes it clear money is a key motivator, there is populist backlash

 

[Leasy]

we're really gonna act like there hasn't bene backlash over beats? there is backlash against apple selling over priced products as well...anytime someone or some company makes a pure profit play and/or makes it clear money is a key motivator, there is populist backlash

What does that have to do with Tidal???? They are offering HIQI music that no other service offers. So you argument is null. Apple makes expensive computers but you can find better ones cheaper same as headphones. Tidal is the first service to offer high quality music that is streamed

 

[CrimsonTider]

This whole post is excellent, but the bolded is top notch.

and everything in that post was WRONG especially the bolded

Jay Z may be the name we’ve heard in connection with Tidal’s new ownership, but today, the company unveiled a lineup of 17 other famous musicians that are also a part of the venture as co-owners: Alicia Keys, Calvin Harris, Win Butler and Régine Chassagne from Arcade fire, Chris Martin from Coldplay, Beyonce, Guy-Manuel de Homem-Christo and Thomas Bangalter from Daft Punk, Jack White, J. Cole, Jason Aldean, Kanye West, Deadmaus, Madonna, Nicki Minaj, Rihanna and Usher.

And they may not be the only ones. In her opening remarks during a launch event in New York, Vania Schlogel — an executive at Aspiro, the parent company of Tidal — confirmed that the music service will be partnering with Sprint and Sprint’s owner, Softbank. But, in keeping with the light-detail theme, she did not provide any details explaining how. Separately, the NY Post reports that Softbank may be partly bankrolling the service.

Then what the fukk is softbank, who runs that and why did the original article mention jay-z only owning 3%????

What in the hell are you confused about?

 

[Artificial Intelligence]

.......................

 

[*L*E*G*A*C*Y*]

Yo . . Streaming doesn't seem like the future. It seems like a future of demise for the industry

This. Final nail in the coffin.

 

[philmonroe]

What celebrities are signed on to endorse Apple?

Learn how to read fakkit instead of just going for the laughs smfh. I put celebrity endorsements and popularity are you saying apple ain't popular now even if not without celebrity endorsements? Are you also saying apple has never had celebrity's in their commercial or anything also? Like I said before learn how to fukking read and stop going for stupid smilie use nikka.

 

[dora_da_destroyer]

i know the source and king never heard of time

your posts reek of a limited mind, you need to expand your life beyond the block, your homies, and smokin

 

[retroracer]

big to who? nobody in my hood reads time magazine. im not worried about what other men are reading and other men telling me that this is a big magazine. its not big to me. i never heard of it until today.

god damn dude keep showing yourself to be a dummy.

 

[The_King_of_Everything]

God this site is getting dumb.

*insert COLI drop*

 

[*L*E*G*A*C*Y*]

Time magazine is the epitome of

This.

And fukk Time Magazine, they had Hitler as "Man Of The Year" in 1938...

Don't believe me?

http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,760539,00.html

 

[dora_da_destroyer]

What does that have to do with Tidal???? They are offering HIQI music that no other service offers. So you argument is null. Apple makes expensive computers but you can find better ones cheaper same as headphones. Tidal is the first service to offer high quality music that is streamed

what? no one in the article is arguing the merits of tidal offering hi-fidelity music, they're talking about these artists standing up there on the premise of "we're entitled to more money"....and hi fidelity music is found elsewhere, for cheaper/free so......

 

[Leasy]

what? no one in the article is arguing the merits of tidal offering hi-fidelity music, they're talking about these artists standing up there on the premise of "we're entitled to more money"....and hi fidelity music is found elsewhere, for cheaper/free so......

Why can't they make more money from their label???? They streaming the shyt out of these artists songs and they getting pennies where as Tidal offers high quality music with more money to artists.

You should be supporting that shyt wtf is wrong with yall. fukk these record companies breh.