I think people make a big thing about the stretch with Trent and Deebo out, but tbh I think it was largely a Trent thing. People will act brand new because it's Purdy but there's a fukking reason LT is considered such a necessary position. SF's O-line is 71 and a whole mess of question marks on the best day. Having him out without anyone to shore the line up and then going into teams with D-line defensive strengths is... an expected bad situation.
SF's playbook is full of 7 step drops. Timing routes, predicated even further on Purdy's anticipation and rhythm. Having someone breathing down your neck when you aren't even through half your dropback and 2 of your players are still at/behind the LOS because of the motions isn't a winnable situation usually. If your O-line anchor was removed on any other team, there would be a drop in production, but people seem just fine ignoring that SF losing the unanimous top LT in the NFL for a few weeks... should matter?
You don't just 'next man up' Trent fukking Williams. If you could, he wouldn't be getting paid what he is.
SF's playbook is full of 7 step drops. Timing routes, predicated even further on Purdy's anticipation and rhythm. Having someone breathing down your neck when you aren't even through half your dropback and 2 of your players are still at/behind the LOS because of the motions isn't a winnable situation usually. If your O-line anchor was removed on any other team, there would be a drop in production, but people seem just fine ignoring that SF losing the unanimous top LT in the NFL for a few weeks... should matter?
You don't just 'next man up' Trent fukking Williams. If you could, he wouldn't be getting paid what he is.
shyt. You can't help yourself when is name is brought up and people correctly shyt on his mediocre ass 
