Shoulda been on MATW, best Pac album by far.
In my iTunes, I actually put it in MATW. I put it at the end so the album can end on a positive note.
Shoulda been on MATW, best Pac album by far.
In my iTunes, I actually put it in MATW. I put it at the end so the album can end on a positive note.


Exactly what Im saying...Pac was never lyrical but he made classic music
All Im sayin is this song is proof lyricism is the least important aspect of makin a classic rap record![]()
That song is the definition of lyricism...
So, you think random similes here and there, recycled punchlines, and forced double entendres with no introspection and message is what lyricism is all about...?
Why is changes lyrical?
Because Pac used the right words to convey his message in a very effective way...
And because of this skill, we are sitting here still appreciating the lyrical content of the song...


This is a timeless song that transcends hip-hop, up there with "Imagine" by John Lennon - that level of timeless. Luckily Tupac actually has the catalog that can support music of this impact or else he'd just be remembered for the greatness of this song
2Pac - Changes ft. Talent - YouTube
It came out at a great time but it'd be a nice to see a song like that from his catalog come out and shake things up in 2013

No breh just no
Thats has to do more with his delivery and message..
Being lyrical is the technical aspect of rap aside from flow(with exception to the aspect of alliteration) and delivery.
Pac was never lyrical
Nas is lyrical
Jay is lyrical
Biggie is lyrical
Pac is not lyrical
He was never about writing metaphors, double/triple entendres, using heavy uses of alliteration which portrays a talent of owning the english vocabulary..
etc.
Pac was never that.
And the fact you call those things forced shows me you arent a rap artist..
To downplay the creativity of lyricism in that way as to call it forced shows that you dont understand why a writer would creatively portray a message with those technical aspects.
It is Pac's delivery..the emotion u can feel in his words, his messages and his character that makes him as beloved as much as he is
Dnt you ever ever ever in your life attribute the aspect of lyricism to him![]()
Pac wasn't that. Let's not kid ourselves. Its not a bad thing tho. You can be as lyrical as you want, if there's no meaning/passion behind the words, its just a bunch of nonsense.
No breh just no
Thats has to do more with his delivery and message..
Being lyrical is the technical aspect of rap aside from flow(with exception to the aspect of alliteration) and delivery.
Pac was never lyrical
Nas is lyrical
Jay is lyrical
Biggie is lyrical
Pac is not lyrical
He was never about writing metaphors, double/triple entendres, using heavy uses of alliteration which portrays a talent of owning the english vocabulary..
etc.
Pac was never that.
And the fact you call those things forced shows me you arent a rap artist..
To downplay the creativity of lyricism in that way as to call it forced shows that you dont understand why a writer would creatively portray a message with those technical aspects.
It is Pac's delivery..the emotion u can feel in his words, his messages and his character that makes him as beloved as much as he is
Dnt you ever ever ever in your life attribute the aspect of lyricism to him![]()
@ those dissin' the art of lyricism in rap.
There's a reason why rappers like Talib Kweli or Ras Kass aren't as appreciated as Pac or Cube.
