Of course. That's why Kamala was busy twerking on Liz Cheney
They think Trump is an aberration instead of the new order. And they'll continue to be shocked every other election by a new stupid demagogue until they change their priorities
What are the chances of AOC running in 2028 and winning?
- Thread starter 2 Up 2 Down
- Start date
Of course. That's why Kamala was busy twerking on Liz Cheney
They think Trump is an aberration instead of the new order. And they'll continue to be shocked every other election by a new stupid demagogue until they change their priorities
The woman experiment is dead.
The only sort of woman that would win would have to be ex military leader who is a hard ass.
AOC too dainty and shrill.
Gonna need some 6 foot tall brunette with an ice cold stare who can gain the respect of men
The only sort of woman that would win would have to be ex military leader who is a hard ass.
AOC too dainty and shrill.
Gonna need some 6 foot tall brunette with an ice cold stare who can gain the respect of men
Koapa
Superstar
Hell nah. I like AOC but Dems better not run another woman. It cost the Dems the 2016 and 2024 election.
Secure Da Bag
Veteran
Assuming Trump does not run in 2028, then AOC's chances are very close to 0. Too young, no team, too many problems, too progressive.
EDIT: Yeah, and the woman for president thing is colder than ice.
EDIT: Yeah, and the woman for president thing is colder than ice.
OneManGang
Veteran
She has zero chance. Simply, America is a conservative country. Full of very stupid people. She’s too progressive and too “different”. Obama really was lightning in a bottle at the very right time under very right circumstances. This country spent the last decade making sure it never happens again
Thanks to me.
feelosofer
#ninergang
Democrats don't have the balls.
Unbothered
All Star
25% chance she'd run and 0% chance she'd win.
We need to have a discussion as to why the Dems and voters keep tryna nominate women as the President. I have no issues with a woman running and/or becoming President, and I fully support the idea of making history, but the problem is that it's clear as day that in this political climate, running a woman for the presidency is a losing strategy, just imagine in 2016 and just recently if the Dems ran a man how different things could've been right now.
Say what you want about Biden, but his victory against Trump, even as close as it was is an example of how you needed a male candidate to beat him, just like it's eye-opening that Trump's only election victories have come against women with his sole loss against a man.
I don't wanna about Hillary Clinton winning the popular vote; none of that shyt matters if you're not winning where it counts, which is the electoral votes. The popular vote is equivalent to voting for the best-dressed couple at the high school prom, it's nothing more than a popularity contest.
With the rising tensions of race and gender becoming a hot commodity right now, running a Puerto Rican woman is no different than running Kamala. I could see a woman becoming President decades from now, but as of today and the foreseeable future, it's a waste of time because America is too racist and misogynistic; AOC being a person of color and a woman is like a double-edged sword
.
That's without even mentioning her staunch progressive political stances which in this current climate has become a boogyman in politics. Progressive beliefs and policies are this era's version of the 50s/60s when Communism stoked fear among many. Conservatism is equivalent to that era's Capitalism. If this was another country such as Mexico, Cuba, parts of Africa, etc, a woman such as herself, Kamala, etc, with their brand of politics would've had an easier chance of winning than they would in the United States.
Shyt not even a Black man can run in this climate.
We need to have a discussion as to why the Dems and voters keep tryna nominate women as the President. I have no issues with a woman running and/or becoming President, and I fully support the idea of making history, but the problem is that it's clear as day that in this political climate, running a woman for the presidency is a losing strategy, just imagine in 2016 and just recently if the Dems ran a man how different things could've been right now.
Say what you want about Biden, but his victory against Trump, even as close as it was is an example of how you needed a male candidate to beat him, just like it's eye-opening that Trump's only election victories have come against women with his sole loss against a man.
I don't wanna about Hillary Clinton winning the popular vote; none of that shyt matters if you're not winning where it counts, which is the electoral votes. The popular vote is equivalent to voting for the best-dressed couple at the high school prom, it's nothing more than a popularity contest.
With the rising tensions of race and gender becoming a hot commodity right now, running a Puerto Rican woman is no different than running Kamala. I could see a woman becoming President decades from now, but as of today and the foreseeable future, it's a waste of time because America is too racist and misogynistic; AOC being a person of color and a woman is like a double-edged sword
.That's without even mentioning her staunch progressive political stances which in this current climate has become a boogyman in politics. Progressive beliefs and policies are this era's version of the 50s/60s when Communism stoked fear among many. Conservatism is equivalent to that era's Capitalism. If this was another country such as Mexico, Cuba, parts of Africa, etc, a woman such as herself, Kamala, etc, with their brand of politics would've had an easier chance of winning than they would in the United States.
Shyt not even a Black man can run in this climate.
Last edited:
We had two women lose to a felon…
A felon who assaults women, incites riots, is the voice of white supremacy, potentially a pedophile and his political experience was being on a reality tv show
Imagine when a woman runs against a regular candidate.
Gonna get blown the fukk out
A felon who assaults women, incites riots, is the voice of white supremacy, potentially a pedophile and his political experience was being on a reality tv show
Imagine when a woman runs against a regular candidate.
Gonna get blown the fukk out
TheDarkCloud
Superstar
This. AOC has no chance in hell.
I was on the Buttigieg bandwagon at first because I think he's smart as hell. He also has a lot of selling points being prior military AND a millennial. But I don't think this country is ready for a gay president yet, either.
It's going to take a straight white male to defeat Trump. And that's just the truth. AOC would get obliterated worse than Kamala did.
It depends on who the republicans have in 2028. A woman can absolutely beat JD Vance
Bootzilla
Direct from the chocolate milkyway
She's too fine and Melanated and a woman for cacs to ever let her be president 
IIVI
Superstar
Sadly with the way some people are happy with the way things are going, I don’t see a Democrat beating Vance.
Republican policies have yet to start hitting people’s pockets and well-being though, that’ll be the main test.
This “cultural” reset though, I see many people content with. Democrats bringing in “minorities” and “women” into their policy list and people are going to tune out. That includes people of those demographics, which is the crazy part. That’s the way this country is right now unfortunately.
Republican policies have yet to start hitting people’s pockets and well-being though, that’ll be the main test.
This “cultural” reset though, I see many people content with. Democrats bringing in “minorities” and “women” into their policy list and people are going to tune out. That includes people of those demographics, which is the crazy part. That’s the way this country is right now unfortunately.
Similar threads
