"When God was dead for 3 days and 3 nights who was controlling the Universe?" - Ahmed Deedat

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,062
Reputation
8,164
Daps
122,315
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Take It In Blood said:
you're saying God was afraid to die, so he made a clone and sent him on a dummy mission instead?

No, one of the 'persons' willingly accepted death to atone for the 'sins' of mankind.

There was no 'clone' since they exist eternally, so, one's existence is not dependent upon another's.

Your question is nothing more than the 'Who made 'G-d'?' question, rephrased, which belies a critical misunderstanding of the theology involved.​
 
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
39,601
Reputation
-17,816
Daps
84,260
Reppin
NULL
Bullet Points: ONLY point 3. applies - which was my original point anyway. No need to repeat anything.

1. It is a non-falsifiable hypothesis so it amounts to a reasoned guess at best.

2. Also the statistical argument at the core of Simulation Arguments is weak because we don't actually know how rare life is.

3. Adding first person Qualia suffering to actors within a simulation is an act of mendacity. I didn't ask why they created a simulation so you repeating yourself "one more time" is because you didn't understand the question. I asked why suffering was added and this is the FIRST time that you have answered that specific question.

4. Any Oxford College founded in the last 150 years or near the bottom of the Norrington Table isn't that great to be honest. Bostrom is at St Cross College founded 1965. All of Oxford University is not equal.

zyKeX7M.png


Norrington Table - Wikipedia

NB. Not to mention that you said that you were being "imprecise and hence not fully detailed/accurate" in your previous posts and now you want to claim that your previous posts were sufficient and your last post is a repetition of what you said before. Tying yourself up in knots.

:rudy: You seem to think I throwing the Simulation Theory out there as a possibility. I know with 100% conviction that its true.

The Mandela Effect (of which I have several examples which I know with absolute certainty have changed) and quantum mechanics experiments (like the Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser experiment) have proven to me that we live in a Simulation.

Elon Musk says its a 99.9999% chance we live in a simulation. I say its 100%.
 
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
39,601
Reputation
-17,816
Daps
84,260
Reppin
NULL
The Simulation Hypothesis is NOT a broadly recognised explanation for wave/particle duality.

"Consciousness actually driving reality" is not at odds with either Many Worlds or Copenhagen.

"It is a way bigger deal" in what sense? It is an open question and one for which other non MW/C interpretations have been suggested. One being future->past causality. We also have non-locality issues in QM so there are clearly still massive gaps in our understanding.

Look man. I'm not here to get into silly debates where we try to show each other how much we know about shyt someone else discovered. You can try to follow the herd. I simply try to illuminate the road for those that want the truth.

The delayed choice quantum eraser experiment is a continuation of the double slit experiment. It essentially tried to take all doubt away when it came to the question of whether our consciousness is actually driving reality. There were many who thought that the results of the double slit experiment were the result of something mechanical we were doing that was affecting the particles and causing them to behave differently. The delayed choice experiment took that doubt away. It was an experimemt designed where only our knowledge of which slit the particle goes through matters. And guess what? The results stayed the same.

If reality behaves differently based on whether we are looking, I don't know how you can argue against the Simulation Theory being the only likely explanation for wave/particle duality. The many worlds theory offers no explanation for why reality cares whether we are looking at it or not. The simulation theory does. It says that if we were in a simulation phenomena like we see in the double slit experiment would be present.
 

FLYINHAWAIIAN

Vegan For a Reason
Joined
May 19, 2013
Messages
16,161
Reputation
3,230
Daps
36,161
Reppin
Hawaii/Houston
Lol yeah none of us know shyt but nikkas so frightened to say “I dont know” and starts explaining inconsistent shyt for hella long.

Out limited human brains have no concept of whats really out there. Trying to define the higher power out there as one thing or as a being with a gender or race is sooooo fukkin human minded.

Its crazy to witness the lengths people go to just to sound like they know what they’re talkibg about. I be doin that shyt too cant eeeem lie but Cheese n Rice, the religious shyt takes the cake :russ:

And in retrospect, they say oxymoronic statements. "Idk but here's the answer".

Relegious nut - :gladbron: lawd jesusvmy bread fell off the fridge, issa ghos'!

Me - :stopitslime: how you know its a ghost? How you know the fridge aint move cuz them dudes got they trunk knockin and its making the wall vibrate? Plus you aint even put it all the way up there right.

Relegious nut - :mjcry: ize dont know but ize know issa ghost in here. Where my sage!!
 

TAYLONDO SAMSWORTHY

Veteran
Verified
Supporter
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
14,750
Reputation
31,975
Daps
119,642
And in retrospect, they say oxymoronic statements. "Idk but here's the answer".

Relegious nut - :gladbron: lawd jesusvmy bread fell off the fridge, issa ghos'!

Me - :stopitslime: how you know its a ghost? How you know the fridge aint move cuz them dudes got they trunk knockin and its making the wall vibrate? Plus you aint even put it all the way up there right.

Relegious nut - :mjcry: ize dont know but ize know issa ghost in here. Where my sage!!


I cantttt :russ:
 

FLYINHAWAIIAN

Vegan For a Reason
Joined
May 19, 2013
Messages
16,161
Reputation
3,230
Daps
36,161
Reppin
Hawaii/Houston
I cantttt :russ:

I've heard people come with that "idk how to explain it but here's the answer" talk.
:stopitslime:
Negros is retarded.

I heard somebody one time tell me about a wreck with one survivor out of multiple people and say its a blessing. Dude got his whole shoulder blade fractioned and its a blessing. "Welsch....he alive. That aint nttn but gawd".
If it was god he coulda stopped the whole wreck in general.

I cant rob you and shoot you in the foot and you say "oh lawd...you blessed me fuh not shootin me in my heads"; when i coulda just not robbed and shot you in the first place.

:snoop:
Fools is stuck on stupid. This god delusion aint nttn but santa clause for adults; something to make you feel good and look foward to
 
  • Dap
Reactions: IVS

IVS

Superstar
Joined
Jun 22, 2012
Messages
12,354
Reputation
2,803
Daps
39,446
Reppin
In the sky
:mjlol::russ:
God the Father and the Holy Spirit obviously duh. Only the God the Son was dead. Did he not read the book.

PS. I dont know how you idiots believe any of this shyt but Carry oooonn....carrrry oonnnnn.
 

IVS

Superstar
Joined
Jun 22, 2012
Messages
12,354
Reputation
2,803
Daps
39,446
Reppin
In the sky
Basic Christianity

God the Son died ...

I don’t understand why people bother to slander a religion that they don’t subscribe to ...
You know why jackazz: Because that fraudulent ass religions causes all types of issues in our reality. So of course we'll comment on humans believing stupid shyt. Most of the wars we fight are because of you idiots believing in prophecies professed in that damn propaganda book which y'all read wrong anyway.

You damn dummies believe that God became incarnate and called himself Jesus. think about that shyt. God became a human just so he could be a rabbi for one ethnic group of people and die. FUX YOU.

Somebodies manipulated the poetic language of the bible to trick you simpletons into believing that Jesus was literally gods child. And they did so using dreams of Joseph and the old manipulative tricks of dream interpretation while using prophecies inserted into the old testament as well.

The whole Son of God, Seed of Heaven idea is based upon the emperor, king, ruler being anointed by the priesthood and functioning as the emissary of the divine thru his rule. Not literally being the child of the God in Heaven.

In ancient China one of the emperors titles is Tian-Tzu (heavenly seed), another chinese expression related to the emperor and his ruling relationship with "God" is ShangDi, the writing of which means literally "Above Emperor" and was a way of expressing the Higher Ruler who granted divine rulership to the emperor.
 
Last edited:

null

...
Joined
Nov 12, 2014
Messages
31,097
Reputation
5,448
Daps
48,917
Reppin
UK, DE, GY, DMV
Look man. I'm not here to get into silly debates where we try to show each other how much we know about shyt someone else discovered. You can try to follow the herd. I simply try to illuminate the road for those that want the truth.

The delayed choice quantum eraser experiment is a continuation of the double slit experiment. It essentially tried to take all doubt away when it came to the question of whether our consciousness is actually driving reality. There were many who thought that the results of the double slit experiment were the result of something mechanical we were doing that was affecting the particles and causing them to behave differently. The delayed choice experiment took that doubt away. It was an experimemt designed where only our knowledge of which slit the particle goes through matters. And guess what? The results stayed the same.

If reality behaves differently based on whether we are looking, I don't know how you can argue against the Simulation Theory being the only likely explanation for wave/particle duality. The many worlds theory offers no explanation for why reality cares whether we are looking at it or not. The simulation theory does. It says that if we were in a simulation phenomena like we see in the double slit experiment would be present.

Show me one peer reviewed scientific journal that states that the simulation hypothesis (NOT theory) is the most likely explanation for wave/particle duality.

Or show me which scientists of significance states that the simulation hypothesis (NOT theory) is the most likely explanation "for wave/particle duality".

You are trying to "illuminate the road" :ufdup: then good. Give me those quotes/papers and I will have a read.

:ufdup:It is a Simulation Hypothesis because it lacks the evidence and form to be promoted to a scientific Theory. It is untestable, unfalsifiable and remains without a solitary shred of direct evidence.
 

Yade

BigJohnsons lol
Joined
Apr 20, 2017
Messages
5,513
Reputation
-1,220
Daps
13,901
God is basically a computer programmer that became one of his avatars


So imagine if the dude who created the SIMS became a SIM one day in his video games while still being fully himself outside the game
 
Top