Im not trying to prove the existence of God or disprove evolution
@ThreeLetterAgency and other atheists mock religious people for being mindless followers when hes doing the same thing. He doesnt understand evolution in depth, or the limitations of the theory. He worships science like a religion
Atheists and religious folk both believe in their own lines of thinking, which is totally fine.
The thing is, if an atheist sees a book saying 2+2 is 3, they'll use evidence and be like, "here are two sets of two objects, count them and you have four, not three. So your answer of three is incorrect." (it's not always as straightforward, and there are many a$$hole atheists who are arrogant and think believers are stupid. I'm guilty of that myself on occasion.)
Whereas if a believer looks in the Bible or other religious text and sees the phrase (as an example), "And the Lord said, put two and two together and you have three. My word is divine." they would somehow try and justify it. Many wouldn't even question it. They would analyze it, question it, but ultimately believe it. (of course, not all believers are this naive and things usually aren't as straight forward)
It appears that one of the many unspoken tenets of religion is to follow without question. To discourage doubt is to enforce ignorance, in my opinion.
Conversely, science encourages doubt and skepticism. Not blind skepticism, but measured and calculated doubt. Should you be of the opinion that an established fact or concept or hypothesis is incorrect, perform experiments, collect data, analyse the results gathered and repeat them until your sample size is swole and your theories are credible and available for peer-review. it is essentially a self correcting method of bullshyt removal and fact collection. Granted, within the realm of science there are fools and corrupt scientists and other obstacles, but it seems to be better than basing lifestyles, life decisions, laws and other important aspects of life on one book. One book of which there are many, many editions. I have found that in life, there is only
one version of the truth, only multiple versions of lies.
Religious texts directly contradict established facts and laws of nature too much for me to personally subscribe to the concept of a higher power.
And if we aren't to take religious texts
literally how are we supposed to interpret them? As mere guidelines to follow and ignore at a whim?
I feel religion isn't compatible with the constantly evolving macrocosm that is human society.
At the end of the day, however, I will respect one's entitlement to believe in whatever they wish.