That's a dumb argument. If those teams were good enough they would have won their respective series'.Because during the 2015 postseason, cats were bringing up the fact that the Warriors dodged the Clippers and the Spurs.
Another wild swing and a miss.
This is thread is about the 2015 Warriors and their postseason run. Hence why I'm comparing the '15 Warriors postseason run to the '20 Lakers postseason run. It's pretty straight-forward.
The comparison still doesn't hold much weight. You can't make an argument that the Lakers benefitted from the same injury luck as the Warriors when most of the injuries sustained by the Lakers' opponents are negligible compared to the Cavs missing their second and third best starters for an entire series. The Cavs were favored before the series and underdogs after Kyrie went down. Dragic's injury is the only injury during the Lakers run that even resembles Love and Kyrie being sidelined for an entire series but his availability doesn't change the complexion of the series: the Heat were heavy underdogs with or without him.
There's a reason the Warriors aren't discredited for beating the 2015 Grizzlies-- a healthy Conley wouldn't have made a difference. Ditto for the 2015 Pelicans-- Holiday's availability doesn't change the course of the series. In later years, you never hear anyone discrediting the Warriors for dismantling 2019 Blazers without Nurkic-- the Blazers didn't have a chance with or without him. Even Kawhi's injury, which has gotten a lot of mileage out of Warriors haters, is mentioned to take the piss out of Warriors fans-- the Spurs would have lost with or without him. The injuries to Kyrie and Love are markedly different than any of these scenarios and you know it.
ETA: As you can see, I'm not arguing about anything other than the injuries the Cavs suffered. The other injuries suffered by the Warriors opponents in the 2015 playoffs had very little influence on the outcomes of those series.
Last edited: