Yes you are being totally objective by strictly focusing on Giannis' role in the loss while completely ignoring Gary Trent's two boneheaded turnovers that are the real reason it was even possible for Indy to be driving for a game winning layup.
Maybe you missed the part when I said -
"Obviously, he's not entirely to blame for what happend in OT."
Furthermore, this thread isn't about Trent Jnr, so why should we be focusing on him? More importantly, he isn't held to the same standard as Giannis is. Also, if you're going to put the spotlight on him for his two turnovers, then you've got to take into account he was the Bucks' leading scorer and the main reason why they went up 7+ points with under a minute to go.
Why focus on his two turnovers when he had 12 points in OT? Are they even in that position in the first place without those 12 points from him?
Are you really out here trying to deflect blame from Giannis onto a role player (who was one of the main reasons the Bucks were even in a position to win)?
And I must stress, I'm making a point around his defense, so if he was this great defensive player like y'all claim he is, how the hell isn't he to blame for giving up that lead?
Great defensive players make sure comebacks of that nature do not happen. And if they do let it happen, then they should be held accountable. If we perceived Giannis to be an average to good defender, depending on the day, then we wouldn't need hold him accountable because we'd expect that result.