gtj1982
Superstar
I'm not mad at this. Haliburton was being a cry baby. He's been up and down all playoffs and wasn't playing well despite the game winner in game 1. He deserved to get criticized.
I'm not mad at this. Haliburton was being a cry baby. He's been up and down all playoffs and wasn't playing well despite the game winner in game 1. He deserved to get criticized.
Then why wasn't SAS' angle more along the lines of "You have had one good game in these Finals" as opposed to "People more important than you have failed at what you're doing"?
The "journalist" of this equation is supposed to remain unbiased.
You're talking about politics, which i don't care about because I don't vote & believe that electoral politics is a scam.![]()
I'm talking about the way they function on a daily basis in the game.
Patrick Mahomes shows up when he's supposed to, doesn't "load manage', doesn't get his coaches fired every year, doesn't call all the people who preceded him plumbers, & blame the media for all of his problems.
What he does in the voting booth is his business.
I bet a lot of NBA players are MAGA, too, but they just know their audience is more liberal, so they hide their c00niness a little bit more, whereas football is more of a country type sport, so they don't have to hide it at as much![]()
Simple answer: It's the most talked about sport that people watch the least of. When I say watch, I mean an actual full-game or condensed 10-15 minute highlights of a game. At least with the NFL, they might watch RedZone throughout the day, and isolated prime-time games.
Then have the nerve to make it the hardest to watch sport too. With that product they put out there![]()
NBA media needs more analyst like this from Shump, compared go Windhorst regurgitating box scores
I had nothing to do with whatever made you decide to defend him.He isn’t doing a report and hasn’t been a journalist in awhile. His job is to share his opinion. You got me looking crazy out here defending SAS.
This is the issue. The talking heads have set out to make themselves the center of attention very openly at the expense of the game and its players, which is a complete betrayal of what their job is supposed to be.I had nothing to do with whatever made you decide to defend him.
For many people, shows like First Take, SPEAK, and The Facility are a primary source for their sports news and analysis. SAS is free to have his opinion, but if I wanted to watch some chatty patty bullshyt, I'd cut on The View.
And most sports talk and analysis is merely chatty patty bullshyt/hot takes galore that rarely have anything to do with the most important current event in sports at the time. I get that engagement is king, but after a certain point I expect a sports analyst to hit me with some shyt that justifies why they are paid to discuss the sport.
Case in point: Haliburton said some shyt about talking heads and criticism. SAS' response wasn't to deliver actual reasoning as to why Haliburton is getting criticism, but rather to say something along the lines of "More important people than you have tried me" to the best player of one of the teams playing for the NBA championship.
Ain't too many people more important than the NBA Finals participants in sports right now. And if there are? ESPN and its personalities are at fault because they aren't doing their jobs to the fullest.