Why was Mike Bibby drafted so high?

I.AM.PIFF

You're minor, we're major
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
13,125
Reputation
11,690
Daps
40,772
It's definitely crazy in retrospect that he was drafted several spots ahead of Dirk, Paul Pierce, and Vince Carter. But Bibby wasn't a disappointment at all - when they swapped out Jason Williams for him, the Kings went to another level.

He's not even disappointing in the context of #2 picks:

2nd Overall NBA Draft Picks

The list of terrible and whatever players from this list is :picard:

Stipanovich, Bowie (he got injured but w/e), Ferry, Bradley, Swift, both Williams, Milicic, Thabeet, Turner, MKG :picard:
 
Last edited:

I.AM.PIFF

You're minor, we're major
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
13,125
Reputation
11,690
Daps
40,772
On topic, the Grizzlies needed a PG and he was the best in the draft. Their PG was Antonio Daniels who had been traded to the Spurs during draft night.
 

I.AM.PIFF

You're minor, we're major
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
13,125
Reputation
11,690
Daps
40,772
This thread would make more sense if it was about Antonio Daniels. He was the real disappointment at his draft position.

Exactly, and the Grizz gave up on him after just a season of play :mjlol:

Lowkey, the 97 draft wasn't that good. TD & Billups were great but also drafted before Daniels. Other than McGrady, the rest was mostly role players and Stack Jack who was a late pick anyway (and took years to succeed in the league).
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,331
Reputation
19,930
Daps
204,102
Reppin
the ether
Jamison, Cat, Shard all had better careers than Bibby. Ricky would have, if he wasn't a knucklehead. Matter of fact, I'm going Al Harrington as well.

Ain't like any of those guys ever won a title or made an All-NBA team. And they all had careers of similar length. So you're basically looking at: how much playoff success did they have and how much did they matter to good teams?

Al Harrington started 7 playoff games in his entire career. He wasn't a guy that mattered at any point.

Jamison only saw the second round twice, and one of those times was when he was with the Cavs and absolutely sucked.

Rashard actually mattered as a scoring stretch four for a little bit, especially when he went to Orlando. But he was a tool that was used well a couple years, it wasn't like he was leading that team.

Cuttino? Ricky Davis? You serious? :picard:


You pretty much just listed some guys who racked up mediocre scoring totals for shyt teams and called that a career. Harrington and Mobley NEVER mattered in the NBA like that. Jamison and Rashard were, at best, sidekicks on suspect rosters.


In 2002 Bibby was a clear top-two player for a team that was up 3-2 in the WCF and was one fixed quarter away from an NBA title. The next year he took the 2003 Mavs to 7 games even after Webber got knocked out for the season in game 2. Then they were one Peja three....TWICE... from beating the 2004 Timberwolves. When he went to the Hawks he immediately pulled them into the playoffs and took the 66-win Celtics to 7, then beat Wade the next year. He was the starting point guard for ten playoff teams and won nine playoff series.

Again, none of these guys were ever All-NBA level or won a title. But Bibby actually led good teams, was a player that mattered from the beginning of his career to the end. If you measure a career by how much winning you do and how much you personally contribute to that winning, Bibby easily had the beast career of them.
 
Last edited:

ahomeplateslugger

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
8,237
Reputation
954
Daps
17,254
you are bugging. bibby was a great player and had a great NBA career for a #2 pick. he turned that kings team into championship contenders and was still a good player for atlanta.

One detail y'all are overlooking is that Vancouver selected Bibby. The Grizzles were a struggle franchise that few bruhs wanted to sign with, because Vancouver seemed like Siberia to them. More than likely Bibby's agent told them he had no problem playing for the grizzles, while other top picks said "naw", which forced their hand. Stevie Franchise refusing to sign with them the following year killed that organization dead.

Also this was the 90s where the formula for organizations was pairing a young PG with a young center. I guess the grizzles were drafting for need versus the best talent available, and thought they were building a foundation by joining Bibby with bum ass big country.

The bigger question is why Piru Piece went so damn low. I get why dirk did because international scouting was poo in the 90s, but Pierce came from a big school and was a big time talent. He almost wasnt a lottery pick. fukk were these lottery teams thinkin'?

seems like teams in the past drafted based on needs and if a player was able to contribute right away rather than potential. from what i remember pierce didn't have a good tournament run so that possibly lowered his stock. still crazy that jason williams was taken before him.
 

I.AM.PIFF

You're minor, we're major
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
13,125
Reputation
11,690
Daps
40,772
Ain't like any of those guys ever won a title or made an All-NBA team. And they all had careers of similar length. So you're basically looking at: how much playoff success did they have and how much did they matter to good teams?

Al Harrington started 7 playoff games in his entire career. He wasn't a guy that mattered at any point.

Jamison only saw the second round twice, and one of those times was when he was with the Cavs and absolutely sucked.

Rashard actually mattered as a scoring stretch four for a little bit, especially when he went to Orlando. But he was a tool that was used well a couple years, it wasn't like he was leading that team.

Cuttino? Ricky Davis? You serious? :picard:


You pretty much just listed some guys who racked up mediocre scoring totals for shyt teams and called that a career. Harrington and Mobley NEVER mattered in the NBA like that. Jamison and Rashard were, at best, sidekicks on suspect rosters.


In 2002 Bibby was a clear top-two player for a team that was up 3-2 in the WCF and was one fixed quarter away from an NBA title. The next year he took the 2003 Mavs to 7 games even after Webber got knocked out for the season in game 2. Then they were one Peja three....TWICE... from beating the 2004 Timberwolves. When he went to the Hawks he immediately pulled them into the playoffs and took the 66-win Celtics to 7, then beat Wade the next year. He was the starting point guard for ten playoff teams and won nine playoff series.

Again, none of these guys were ever All-NBA level or won a title. But Bibby actually led good teams, was a player that mattered from the beginning of his career to the end. If you measure a career by how much winning you do and how much you personally contribute to that winning, Bibby easily had the beast career of them.

I'll also say he probably had the most "heart" out of those Sacto teams as C-Webb/Peja often choked or played below their standards.
 

Frump

Superstar
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
16,249
Reputation
-2,332
Daps
47,901
Reppin
NULL
He made his career off that Kings Laker series where he took advantage of lazy Shaq on the pick n rolls and hit about 100 wide open midrange jumpers that series
 

MJ Truth

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 1, 2015
Messages
39,086
Reputation
3,755
Daps
155,413
i know he was coming off a National Championship and when I look at NBAdraft.net there was no current player who he can be compared too. He was a disappointment but I wanted to know what made him go so high?
By what metric? I've NEVER heard anyone call Mike Bibby a disappointment or anything like that.
 

MJ Truth

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 1, 2015
Messages
39,086
Reputation
3,755
Daps
155,413
Jamison, Cat, Shard all had better careers than Bibby. Ricky would have, if he wasn't a knucklehead. Matter of fact, I'm going Al Harrington as well.
Nah.

None of those guys were ever the leading or second leading player on a team that accomplished what Bibby did with the Kings. Saying Al Harrington had a better career than Mike Bibby is just ridiculous. The only arguable person on your list is Jamison.
 

JackRoss

Veteran
Joined
Jun 21, 2015
Messages
34,792
Reputation
3,372
Daps
75,473
He made his career off that Kings Laker series where he took advantage of lazy Shaq on the pick n rolls and hit about 100 wide open midrange jumpers that series

You mad because he was doing what the fukk he was suppose to do? Should have missed the shots?? Should he have altered his play because of "lazy Shaq"? The way people like you try to discredit people says a lot about who you are.. Go play in traffic
 

thatrapsfan

Superstar
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
18,503
Reputation
1,989
Daps
55,844
Reppin
NULL
Ain't like any of those guys ever won a title or made an All-NBA team. And they all had careers of similar length. So you're basically looking at: how much playoff success did they have and how much did they matter to good teams?

Al Harrington started 7 playoff games in his entire career. He wasn't a guy that mattered at any point.

Jamison only saw the second round twice, and one of those times was when he was with the Cavs and absolutely sucked.

Rashard actually mattered as a scoring stretch four for a little bit, especially when he went to Orlando. But he was a tool that was used well a couple years, it wasn't like he was leading that team.

Cuttino? Ricky Davis? You serious? :picard:


You pretty much just listed some guys who racked up mediocre scoring totals for shyt teams and called that a career. Harrington and Mobley NEVER mattered in the NBA like that. Jamison and Rashard were, at best, sidekicks on suspect rosters.


In 2002 Bibby was a clear top-two player for a team that was up 3-2 in the WCF and was one fixed quarter away from an NBA title. The next year he took the 2003 Mavs to 7 games even after Webber got knocked out for the season in game 2. Then they were one Peja three....TWICE... from beating the 2004 Timberwolves. When he went to the Hawks he immediately pulled them into the playoffs and took the 66-win Celtics to 7, then beat Wade the next year. He was the starting point guard for ten playoff teams and won nine playoff series.

Again, none of these guys were ever All-NBA level or won a title. But Bibby actually led good teams, was a player that mattered from the beginning of his career to the end. If you measure a career by how much winning you do and how much you personally contribute to that winning, Bibby easily had the beast career of them.
These dudes must be really young and can only remember:flabbynsick: Bibby from the Knicks and Heat. Dude had an impressive basketball career from college to pros, period.
 
Top