Y'all Better Stop Slandering Brock Purdy

King Kreole

natural blondie like goku
Joined
Mar 8, 2014
Messages
16,880
Reputation
4,608
Daps
45,470
Comparing raw QB numbers from different eras is foolish. The post 2010 QB will always have the advantage.over the QBs who came before. Guys like Teddy Bridgewater have a batter career passer rating than Dan Marino. Is that a product of play or era? There are stats that are era adjusted that can be used like... ANY/A, DVOA and DYAR. But raw numbers will almost always favor the more modern QB
Depends on the stats you're comparing. Raw passing yardage is of course an unreasonable metric given the rules changes, but TD-INT ratio is still a fairly reasonable comparison. The post-2010s QBs may have a push-factor in the stats, but they're also being asked to do far more than the previous era QBs. And the advanced metrics you mentioned like ANY/A and DVOA use TDs and Ints as foundational statistics in their models because regardless of era, a QB throwing a TD is the most positive outcome on any play and throwing an interception is the worst outcome on any play.
 

CHICAGO

Vol. 9: Trapped
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
65,961
Reputation
14,077
Daps
416,775
Reppin
CHICAGO
There are too many haters and stans in sports discourse now, so people are just trying to get their hot takes off. But the real answer is longevity. Lamar has 2x MVPs and 3x First-Team All Pros, so even if he does have a stinker slump he still has a 7-season resume of Tier 1 play to fall back on. The younger guys don't have that. Mahomes lowkey has been playing Tier-2 ball for the past few years but he has 5-seasons worth of goated play so he's pretty much untouchable. It is what it is. People are just too quick to give up on young QBs figuring it out, which is why they have these stupid whiplash takes where one game a guy is an elite future-goat and the next game he's a bum who should be benched. If social media was around back in the day these same guys would be saying the same stupid shyt about a ton of HOF QBs.

Purdy is on his 40th start with 70 TDs and 32 ints. At their 40th starts, Peyton Manning had 70 TDs and 52 ints, Brady had 57 TDs and 34 ints, Brees had 51 TDs and 37 ints, Roethlisberger had 50 TDs and 41 ints. Mahomes being a unicorn who dominated basically immediately has destroyed people's perception of normal QB development.

:snoop:COMPARE PASSING STATS
FROM THE EARLY 2000S
TO THE CURRENT NFL BREAUGHS

:devil:
:evil:
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
200,494
Reputation
27,080
Daps
643,146
Reppin
49ers..Braves..Celtics
Comparing raw QB numbers from different eras is foolish. The post 2010 QB will always have the advantage.over the QBs who came before. Guys like Teddy Bridgewater have a batter career passer rating than Dan Marino. Is that a product of play or era? There are stats that are era adjusted that can be used like... ANY/A, DVOA and DYAR. But raw numbers will almost always favor the more modern QB

Let's just keep it to present day @premier58 Purdy's career QB rating is 103.1 even after the bad half last week

The guys making "Brock money"

Kyler Murray: 92.2

Tua: 96.6

Dak: 98.5

Jordan Love: 97.4

Trevor Lawrence: 84.2

Herbert: 96.4

Goff: 96.8

Jalen Hurts: 95.0

Watson: 98.8


Guys making a little less than "Brock money"


Baker: 91.4

Geno Smith: 87.4

Darnold: 86.4
 

feelosofer

#ninergang
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
53,532
Reputation
9,532
Daps
159,843
Reppin
Brick City, NJ
Who upped this thread? we already know Mac Jones>>>>>>>>>>>Purdy

This is recency bias. Mac was damn near out of the league after last season.and he isn't as good as Sam Darnold or even Daniel Jones.

He did a very good job when asked to play but even towards the end he wasn't as good. He had the same pass chart as Purdy did his rookie year but he's better now.

Brock has obviously been playing hurt all season and Kyle Shanahan should have had the stones to shut him down the rest of the season to let the turf toe fully heal.
 
Top