the only thing you're liberal on is rights for your fellow homosexuals, which is probably the only reason you hate religion.
Apparently the Clinton Transcripts just Leaked
- Thread starter Tate
- Start date
i'm waiting for this to be anti-liberal...or at least show where the problem is.the only thing you're liberal on is rights for your fellow homosexuals.
She better not do it
She'll not only be a one termer and someone will primary her
Nap
You're only liberal on wedge issues
On Econ and IR you're a conservative or neocon
umm there are people who are experienced in regulation and the finance industry and aren't goldman sachs "wall street guys" or "activists".
you don't go to the people who created and continue to create financial crises and think they will fix the problem. this is like letting police departments reform themselves because police officers happen to know more about police policy than the average person
This basically confirms her as a liar but we already knew that, her trustworthy numbers are in the tank.
I know we got the spin team in here ready for war but this doesn't really hurt her against Trump. Had these dropped against Bernie around Feb/Mar. things would have been interesting. Her current call for free tuition ain't happening with her because her bank buddies won't let that fly.
But I and many people already have stated she's Wall Street's gal, this is a known quantity. And for the people on her saying vote for her for X reason over Trump I get that but at some point voting for Big Pharma, Wall Street, MIC sellouts are gonna keep fukking us over with platitudes and lip service. Wall Street is gonna keep destroying the economy every decade and get a slap on the wrist and a reset until we hold them nikkas accountable for their shyt. Right now we're like a mother who always gives her kid a second chance because she can't cut him off.
We'll learn eventually and obviously this ain't the year but hopefully before it's too late.
I know we got the spin team in here ready for war but this doesn't really hurt her against Trump. Had these dropped against Bernie around Feb/Mar. things would have been interesting. Her current call for free tuition ain't happening with her because her bank buddies won't let that fly.
But I and many people already have stated she's Wall Street's gal, this is a known quantity. And for the people on her saying vote for her for X reason over Trump I get that but at some point voting for Big Pharma, Wall Street, MIC sellouts are gonna keep fukking us over with platitudes and lip service. Wall Street is gonna keep destroying the economy every decade and get a slap on the wrist and a reset until we hold them nikkas accountable for their shyt. Right now we're like a mother who always gives her kid a second chance because she can't cut him off.
We'll learn eventually and obviously this ain't the year but hopefully before it's too late.
I'm center left on econ.She better not do it
She'll not only be a one termer and someone will primary her
Nap
You're only liberal on wedge issues
On Econ and IR you're a conservative or neocon
if i was gay?the only thing you're liberal on is rights for your fellow homosexuals, which is probably the only reason you hate religion.
i've never met a liberal who supported raising the retirement age for social security.
you mean the same "liberal scandinavians" who are reforming their own social security with the same mandates?i've never met a liberal who supported raising the retirement age for social security.
The End of Nordic Illusions
No, there are not many people who are experienced in regulation or the finance industry that are not "wall street guys." You're just wrong. At some point or another they probably worked in finance and understand that mindset. When I say "wall street" guys, I mean people with experience with finance at high-level. Low level people just follow the trends anyway. When I say activists, I mean academics who have studied the topic but never practiced. There are limitations to that. A big one is a lack of understanding of the human element and how people process information or how they act in certain situations. This is why people often bring in practitioners to explain concepts or how it works every day.
Elizabeth Warren is as hard on Wall Street as anyone else and she comes from what used to be one of the titans. Elliot Spitzer was tough on Wall Street, but he was a "wall street" guy. Again, by "Wall Street" guy, I mean someone like an SEC official or an NY-DA who has relationships with most of these people. We all went to law school together, and were taught the subject matter the same way, we just took different paths. But we're not exactly from a "different cloth." These are the same people you're chilling with at bar association events.
Moreover, the police department argument is awful. No one is going to appoint the typical laymen to regulate police departments and no one is going to appoint some random activist off the street to regulate Wall Street. However, the level of complexity involved in that role is miles apart from the sophistication required to understand financial markets. Half the type the people on Wall Street themselves don't know what the fukk they're trading.
nothing more liberal than austerity.you mean the same "liberal scandinavians" who are reforming their own social security with the same mandates?
The End of Nordic Illusions
You really getting paid for these posts no way you just agreed with that
Welfare is made for societies.nothing more liberal than austerity.
Fixing welfare to face the needs of the country is a good thing.
People are working longer and living longer.
This isn't 1949.
Revolving Wall Street to Washington door has to be shut. Obviously someone that was very high up in a big bank is going to have hesitations about regulating the shyt out of their friends. Get legit economists, SEC, CFPB members working on legit regulation with out the kid gloves. I'm sick of seeing the SEC settle with these clowns on Wall Street, charge them
JahFocus CS
Get It How You Get It
Too little, too late.