Good pitchers manage the game too. The guys who can dominate by striking guys out will always be more valued than a ground ball guy.
I'm not misinterpreting shyt. I know what people mean when they say game managing qb. And again, I take offense to that term because the qbs purpose is to manage the game. Another deragatory term is 'dink and dunk', as if throwing 10 passes for 4 yards each is any worse than throwing one for 40. So u have ppl like trip who will never admit pennington or garcia were good qbs because they had meh arms and couldn't throw lasers.
But lets also not call Alex Smith a good QB because he had a top QB rating for half a season.
He also had a top QB rating for a full season in 2011.
He is a good QB, if you were to grade qb's he`d get a B.
We will get to see what he really is when he goes to a new team.
I didnt do that tho. I said it multiple times that this season he's regressed even though his qb rating went up a lot.But lets also not call Alex Smith a good QB because he had a top QB rating for half a season.
not my fault you hang with retardsYou are literally the only person I've ever seen call Chad Pennington a good QB to this day.

I have nothing against big plays and arm strength. it doesnt matter to me HOW you get points.This bizarre pillage youre on against arm strength and big plays is getting stupid.
there is ZERO difference between you getting a first down by 2 incompletions and a 10 yard pass, and you getting 4, 4 and 2 yards by "dinking and dunking"Your take on how the game is played, and how teams are winning football games is way off. .
Good pitchers manage the game too. The guys who can dominate by striking guys out will always be more valued than a ground ball guy.
I'm not misinterpreting shyt. I know what people mean when they say game managing qb. And again, I take offense to that term because the qbs purpose is to manage the game. Another deragatory term is 'dink and dunk', as if throwing 10 passes for 4 yards each is any worse than throwing one for 40. So u have ppl like trip who will never admit pennington or garcia were good qbs because they had meh arms and couldn't throw lasers.
dink and dunk is used in general for everything that isnt long throws.Dink and dunk is derogatory because it's implied that you're incapable of throwing one for 40, so when you need to get down the field in a short amount of time, you're unable to, which limits you and your team.
dink and dunk is used in general for everything that isnt long throws.
its just when brady and peyton do it, people dont call it that. they call it smart short throws to pickup a first down
That's dinking and dunking, but they're not known as dink and dunk QB's because they can air it out and score in a heartbeat if need be.
so you see there's double standards with the same base action in question
the fundamentals of football is to get x amount of yards per y amount of downs. it doesnt fukking matter how you do it. in todays passing league, running the ball and short passes are looked down upon unless its a proven flamethrower.
its disgusting.