the average team takes 40% of their shots from 3
These dudes stay with the excuses my god the NBA is so trash.
the average team takes 40% of their shots from 3
This is how the game has always been. Refs have always had a favoritism hierarchy amongst players. MJ being at the top of that pyramid.It ain't just that. Refs are fixing games by picking favoritism on foul calls so now everyone wants to play like Reggie Miller to avoid contact. Every contact is a foul unless you've earned your stripes.
Back then MJ had tougher defenders on him. He would thrive in this era with ease. KD and LeBron are a few of the only guards that could transition well.This is how the game has always been. Refs have always had a favoritism hierarchy amongst players. MJ being at the top of that pyramid.
It ain't just that. Refs are fixing games by picking favoritism on foul calls so now everyone wants to play like Reggie Miller to avoid contact. Every contact is a foul unless you've earned your stripes.
Reread what I said. Reggie wrote the blueprint for this eras style of play. I couldn't stand him. His flopping and refs favoritism is the reason for the lack of defense.U can’t be a basketball fan if u think Reggie Miller ever tried to avoid contact. He’s the 90s prototype for what the game is now. 3 point shooting flopper at it best.
reallyyou mean to tell me that the teams that have hit more shots have usually won their games
I am referring to the fact that these teams are playing a similar style to one another and little more than who hits more 3s is deciding the winner of the game
other factors aren't playing as big a role in the decision because everything else is mostly equal so that's the 1 area of the game that stands out the most now
these young nikkas not built to dominate like this fakkit ass nikkas
The 3-pt shot is deciding games more in this era, because teams are taking it more, that's obvious. But in terms of shot distribution the only major difference between the NBA now and the NBA 20 years ago is that the rate in which terms took mid-range shots from 10 ft-3pt line has essentially swapped places with the rate in which teams took 3 pointers.
So I guess the question is, what's really the major difference between a team taking 40% of their shots from 3 and a team taking 40% of their shots from the mid range? If the rate of 3-pters being taken dictates that they're solely deciding the outcomes of games, wouldn't the same be said of the opposite to some extent?
Reread what I said. Reggie wrote the blueprint for this eras style of play. I couldn't stand him. His flopping and refs favoritism is the reason for the lack of defense.
I've been saying the NBA as we knew it died in 2014. Last great year of NBA basketball.

 
I'm not just talking about where teams are taking a majority of their shots now or 10 -20 years ago....I am talking about what teams saw as their identity and how they implemented it every game and how it affected the decision of the game. Some teams were all about defense, some centered themselves around the bigs' post play, others their guard perimeter play, and some had a balanced attack. It's not like that anymore and that's what I'm pointing out...lack of variety in these teams is adding to this if they're not hitting 3s..."insert VC it's over gif"
Defense was terrible in the 1980s. High pace, tons of fast breaks, teams tended to just pack all their defenders into the key and give up every 3pt shot and most midrange shots without any pressure. And offenses were simplistic as fukk, a lot of two-man game with the other players standing around. Remember, Stockton and Malone running pick-and-roles with one shooter and two offensive non-factors on the court was considered a dominant play at the time.
The Pistons ruined everyone's fun by playing hard-effort defense on every play and not giving up anything. They won titles that way and other teams had to match it or be left behind. By '94-'95, everyone in the league who mattered was playing hard defense. Since the offensive skills didn't match yet (especially because rapid expansion of 6 new teams had diluted talent), pace and scoring got dragged down.
By the late 90s, teams started trying to combat suffocating defense by turning to iso-ball, just dumping the ball to the best offensive player and having him go to work while getting everyone else out of the way. That was boring as fukk, so NBA first instituted the 5-second rule and then started allowing zone defenses.
With motivated, high-movement defenses and the ability to zone, teams could cover the entire key and then some effectively. Post-ups and drives and open mid-range shots became much difficult to come by. The only way to truly beat the zone was to force defenses to respect the 3pt. It allowed offenses to shoot over the zone when players didn't come out, and to have space to drive and score inside when they did come out. So 3pt shooting became the wave.
Add in analytics which allowed teams to adapt in the same directions faster than ever before, and you have the situation today.
 .
.