Chicks You Smash Vs. Chicks You Cuff?
- Thread starter SheWantTheD
- Start date
NotAnFBIagent
[redacted]
Looks, availability
Vs looks + feelings/personality
Vs looks + feelings/personality
NotAnFBIagent
[redacted]
Thats how women are with giving up the pussnikkas love to act like "cuffing" is bestowing some grand honorthe way deciding to make a commitment is talked about on here is ridiculous
Action Mike
All praise..
nikkas love to act like "cuffing" is bestowing some grand honor
is it because women want it more vice versa women act like "sex" is bestowing some grand honorLarry Lambo
Superstar
nikkas love to act like "cuffing" is bestowing some grand honor
Hmm...
After a certain point in life, a man shouldn't "cuff" a woman unless he is serious about her and is dating with the goal of marriage. I'd say that is at least a compliment.
If you are cuffing with the same level of commitment as a 17 year boyfriend/girlfriend set up, then yeah it doesn't mean much. But in order for me to "cuff", I'd literally have to think there was a chance of marriage.
Of course, I wouldn't know for sure, and we would have find out in the process if it could work, but the fact that I see the potential in her and us as a couple, I think has some value.
the bossman
Superstar
But majority of women prefer to be with one guy they like instead of out here jumping from dude to dudenikkas love to act like "cuffing" is bestowing some grand honor
It's not just here. The subject matter of this convo is not exclusive to coli men. Most men have to go through this thought process before investing their time into an exclusive relationship.nikkas love to act like "cuffing" is bestowing some grand honor
Larry Lambo
Superstar
Semantics. The willingness of the other party is implied.
Guys don't feel the need to qualify a statement like "I'd cuff or I'd smash" with "if she let me". Of course they can only do it if she lets them.