DREAMZZZ said:
Learn the difference between subjective and objective morality.
I know the difference. The problem is, atheists do not and cannot live happily and consistently while adhering to a worldview in which objective morality doesn't exist. Objective morality cannot exist without an objective point of reference. There is no objective reference for morality given atheism. It is subjective, therefore, not binding on all people at all times and all places.
DREAMZZZ said:
Who is saying this? This is not my argument.
I didn't say it was. The issue is that if 'G-d' does not exist, then human beings can have no 'purpose' since they are the accidental result of time + matter + chance. Accidents can have no 'purpose'.
DREAMZZZ said:
I never said this either.
Correct, which is why I underlined always.
DREAMZZZ said:
Says logic. If things begin to exist, that means prior to their existence, they did not exist.
DREAMZZZ said:
Your going to have to explain this one to me.
Human beings are the only organisms that are known to have an understanding of time in the past, present, and future.
DREAMZZZ said:
So your saying that anything that is not objective doesn't matter?
I'm saying that things that are not objective have no meaningful significance to anyone other than those who deem them significant. My mother's life is significant to me and other family members as well as her friends and acquaintances, but not to anyone else. If she were to cease existing, no one's life other than those of us who consider her significant would be affected.
If the Earth were to cease existing, the rest of the Universe would not be affected.
If the Universe were to cease existing,...................

DREAMZZZ said:
They have meaning to me and a lot of other people on this earth.
Ultimately, you and the rest of the people of the Earth are meaningless. The Earth, itself, is meaningless. The Universe is meaningless.