'mark' was his word, not mine....that was his way of saying it wasnt hot...
just like i said to him: you comparing albums from artists that had backing (the wu name/albums, dr dre name/album) to his debut album to say he 'was just another rapper and the album wasnt hot' lol...aight man...
as for that' hit' comment: that's what others have been saying, not me...they were saying it wasnt a hit/hot based off sales...i said: when it dropped, cats in my city and that came to my city from out of town were bumping it....also, people in my school were doing what you said when the album dropped....that's why i said the album was 'hot', and disagree with future....
Your experience =/= reality. The vast majority of people in this thread heard Future and
"he's right". So should we listen to the majority, or you?I heard the album in 1996 too but I'm not gonna sit here like it was widely known or talked about because my circle had it. I had Volume 10's debut album too, it don't really mean much.And I'm not comparing anything, I'll telling you what happened. If a discussion occurred....and people were talking about BONE, Wu, Outkast, Nas, Pac, BIG....Jay? People would be like "who is Jay-Z?"
You can give reasons for that like "well, he didn't have the backing of those other guys" but the end result is still the same.
I don't know what any of this has to do with what I said.
Because you're saying the quality of the album was evident which is all fine and well but means absolutely nothing if people don't care enough to listen to it.
illmatic had a commercial impact?
He said "critically or commercially". Nas was getting compared to Rakim, so yeah. It would be like if you were fresh out of HS getting compared to Jordan.
Fred.
?


