Let's take "Battle of the b*stards", which is supposed to be "The Greatest Game of Thrones Episode Ever!" by some of the fanboys, and break down the places where the writing and/or plot/character depth just sucked.
* Daenerys and Tyrion talking casually while violence reigns down from the sky and a wall crumbles next to them is corny. They would have secured themselves away from the incoming, not just had a chat in that vulnerable area. But the writers set them up like the situation is desperate, even though it's not really desperate, and the way they're acting isn't in line with the situation - it's just a writing play to set up the next scene.
* Tyrion is explaining WAY too much in that scene...he's really talking to the audience, not Daenerys.
* Daenerys responding to the surrender demand with "You must be mistaken, we're here to discuss your surrender" was a corny, cheap hollywood cliche line that you could see coming a mile away.
* The burning of the ships was silly. The strategy was ridiculous, it was like they filmed it thinking, "they're dragons, people will believe anything". If you had helicopters, would you have trained all of them on a single ship and kept firing on it incessantly even though its occupants were already dead or gone, when all the other ships were right there? Would you stay hovering in one spot asking to be shot down when they have artillery firing at you like crazy? Would you unnecessarily burn the ship to the core even after Grey had just said, "Our queen likes ships"? The dragons would have been moving from ship to ship quickly, focusing on getting the people (one sweep of fire would do the trick) and disabling the weapons, not just sitting around playing with one ship.
* The whole "we have to kill one of you" followed by the two a$$holes saying "kill him, he's low-born" thing, followed by them getting killed in his place was corny cliches again, contrived as fukk, poorly acted (even though the acting is usually much better), and once again, you could see what was coming a mile away.
* Tyrion's "go back and tell your people what you saw here" was another corny, cheap movie cliche that's been done a million times.
* The Sons of the Harpy's random pillaging gave the impression that the director had gotten tired of thinking through battle scenes and took a quick way out. Try to think about why random freemen would be just milling about outside the gate in nice little well-separated groups in the open so they can be ravaged. If you think about it there is no backstory that could possibly lead to that situation, they just lined some people up to get killed.
* Then the whole, "Here comes the overwhelming cavalry - haha you're getting destroyed" when the Dothraki ride in was another film cliche.
* Finally, it all ends with a way-too-overtly-feminist moment.
On to the western battle....
* Ramsey being a brilliant battle commander makes no sense. He is able to carefully and strategically manipulate Jon Snow the whole time, which is out of line with his unhinged, emotionally unstable character. How is every move he makes in battle perfect? This is the issue with the character development in this show. Ramsey repeatedly has been able to make moves like this, always executes his evil plans perfectly, even though he didn't appear at any point to be the kind of person who should have been able to plot so competently.
* Why does Rickon run away in a straight line like an idiot, doing exactly what Ramsey wants him to do? Why is Ramsey a master archer? Remember the similar but far better running scene in Apocalypto? That's how a real man would act, dodging and weaving and looking for cover, not just running like an idiot when he knows that any talented archer will taken him out the first moment he wants to.
* Why are all those men loyally fighting to the death for Ramsey? When he murders Rickon Stark, the heir of Winterfell, right in front of their faces, why do they keep fighting? Completely unexplained.
* Davos having the archers get ready to fire, and then having them stand down because "it's no good - we'll just kill our own men" was pandering to a stupid audience. He never would have had his archers ready their arrows in the first place for that very reason, and the need to explain out loud why he was standing down definitely wasn't necessary. Ramsey firing into the battle, and Davos not doing it, should have been enough to reinforce that Ramsey is a cruel man. Davos's actions don't make sense except to create a cheap movie moment for a slow audience.
* Jon Snow losing his mind, making error after error, doing a dozen things that should have gotten him killed but having some lucky salvation every time, getting missed by hundreds of arrows...it just got old after a while. One of the most tired plot armor scenes I've had to watch.
* How did a bunch of guys with giant shields surround the whole army, including cavalry and a giant who can kinda see over people's heads? That made no sense. At least the director admitted it was a budget-saving device that was done to "look cool" on the cheap, since filming with active horizons is expensive.
* The Stark forces are saved by a deus ex machina (here comes the new guys riding in for the rescue!), which already happened once earlier in the episode. And for the Bolton forces to be destroyed by something outside of Ramsey/Snow's characters/relationship was a disservice to the characters.
* Why weren't these guys here earlier? Why wasn't the possibility even mentioned by Sansa? Jon Snow could have been killed a hundred times before they got there, when all he needed to do was wait. Again, just audience manipulation - Jon Snow nearly dies and is barely saved just to play with the audience, not because it makes any sense when you think about it.
* Sansa getting her revenge and Ramsey being eaten by his own hounds....yet another cliche moment.
Overall, so much crap happens the way you know it has to happen for the audience, but makes no sense according to how it should happen for the characters. That's what I'm calling lack of plot/character depth. It's an audience-driven show, not a plot-driven show. They're in it for the ratings (hell, even George R.R. Martin has talked about how much he has the audience in mind when he writes), not for the world that they've created.
If you take away the budget and production value Game of Thrones is a corny show on the same level as Sons of Anarchy and Power. And I like both of those shows but they are glorified soap operas
People have been getting fooled by British accents since forever
Actually, now that I think about it, Thrones is on the exact same level as House of Cards. Fancy looking shows that are full of flaws...
lol how does that make me miserable I watched 5 seasons of this show, it just wasn't that good. And yes a bunch of British accents will make shytty writing sound like Shakespeare (he was British and his name is synonymous with great writing, see how it works?). Its not a "militant" thing. Plenty of black people watch this show, but that doesn't make it great...]
The whole goal in Game of Thrones currently, seems to be female empowerment, and "breaking the internet" moments.
lol at this thread. all yall need is overt sex scenes and graphic violence and a show is GOAT to you
Like Boesky says especially, the show looks beautiful, and they're lining up those "moments" constantly, and that stuff combined with enough intricacies to go into forever will keep the fanboys hooked...just like a soap opera.