I have nothing against having a young qb sitting. Just don't see what bringing an old washed up brittle vet who will hang it up real soon brings.i didn't argue one way or another for romo, just disagreed with the premise of sitting a season or two being outdated, especially since the day 1 starter motif hasn't been a smashing success either
These two quotes are what bother me most about the Niners and why I'm done giving money (and energy) to them. The Yorks not only don't seem to care about football - it's just some shyt they have in their portfolio to cake off of - they're also cheap and greedy, so much so that they won't bother to pay up to bring in the type of operations personnel that will run the team competently. We cannot fukking win with them...they're caking right now off the strength of the NFL being what it is and have zero incentive to make things better.
Cut
there more talent on this team imo
but they did kinda sway me to the chip Kelly needs to go this year side of the arguments. Basically, giving chip a second year with what we've seen from him and where them team is isn't any different than giving him one year, so it comes down to he's either one and done or you feel comfortable giving him 3-4 years because nothing is happening in year two (well maybe 3-4 more wins). If we get a new GM, year two isn't enough time to see if chip does better with presumably better talent. 
