@ y'all thinking those front office people are just using PER.
That's bullshyt. The A's got a bang for their buck using money ball.
But no championship.

You either 1st or you last.

@ y'all thinking those front office people are just using PER.
That's bullshyt. The A's got a bang for their buck using money ball.
You can build through the draft while incorporating analytics....most teams in the league use them anyways
FreedS[ohh]lave;4408968 said:You dont need analytics to tell you without a top player you cant win a title
Pondexter and Bayless are the lineups that would spread the floor with their ability to shoot from the outside. It was useless to even dump the ball into zbo when Leonard was standing with a foot in the paint ignoring Prince.
But no championship.While they was playing money ball, the Angels won a championship.
You either 1st or you last.![]()
we can go back and forth all day on this....analytics can help you determine top players/best lineups/matchups etc...
Even with Spo...there's a rhyme and reason behind the guys who are on the floor with Lebron from a supporting standpoint. Why do you think Battier got benched?
So? You swear that every team in the league is winning fukking championships, especially in The NBA.
I understand the need for analytics, you can't be completely ignorant to numbers, they are useful when used correctly in any business. But to go in other extreme is just as bad.
we can go back and forth all day on this....analytics can help you determine top players/best lineups/matchups etc...
Even with Spo...there's a rhyme and reason behind the guys who are on the floor with Lebron from a supporting standpoint. Why do you think Battier got benched?
Dawg, you're relying on on Qunicy Pondexter and Jerrod Bayless to get you to the WCF?See how ridiculous that sounds.
Bayless is a streak shooter at best who should never be reiled upon. Pondexter wouldnt be a career starter anywhere else either.
FreedS[ohh]lave;4409083 said:Heat are gonna win a title with close to a one man team and we already discussed the history of the league it might be time to give up your team ball theory and how you dont need great players to win titles.. i really dont know how much more evidence you need
Apparently 59 out of 60 teams winning with a certain formula is not a big enough sample size for you to consider looking at it my way![]()