Must be 2 different Pacers teams, the one I've been watching doesn't look and play bad on a regular basis
Carlisle avatar bassd starting lineup.
Is why the pacers run hot to cold.
If carlisle would make a lineup. That did not usurp haliban at point. To start obi and math over nembhard and nesmith.
The pacers would have more consistent play.
I get why carlisle does this lineup in this manner. As nesmith and nembhard need the starting lineup call confidence boost.
to be effective. Yet that Ruins haliban as a leader. As it shrinks the lineup.
as well as puts to many pg like players.
on court at the same time in nembhard and nesmith. Who are too small at the two and three. Plus downsize indy's defensive effectiveness and length on paper to the floor.
The pacers would be more effective. Night to night if math and obi start. As it does not send mixed signals to the team on who the leader is. By running nembhard and nesmith aa starters. It nerfs haliban and usurps his leadership on the floor.
Haliban is just a good player. Who already endured having his leadership usurped in sac-town. So haliban will play throughed't the confusion. Yet it hurts haliban as a distributor and also a scorer. As the ball is taken out of his hands. With nesmith and nembhard on court.
All of haliban inconsistent play comes from that.
Carlisle coaches this team like a nba version of seirra canyon. Yet just like seirra canyon. The players never make themselves into the position of power. As the talent on roster undermines the heirarchy and social dynamic of play on court from back court to front court.
That if challenged. That can be exploited under duress.
by an equally staffed team. That has better positional roster management.
Indy stole home court advantage and only has to hold serve. Yet carlisle has made more work for himself. Basically making indy into what if seirra canyon dynamics occurred in the nba. When the nba success atypically has to have clear cut defined roster management.. especially as far as leadership at point.
Art Barr