2016 warriors?
they not even beating the 2015 warriors 
2016 warriors?
they not even beating the 2015 warriors 
The funny thing is that people go "well this team played this way, shot this much, played at this pace"
As if it's an automatic thing that 1 team can dictate their pace or their style but the other team can't.
Nobody here seems to account for the difference in era.
It's like saying the 2015 Saints would beat the 75 Steelers because of Brees' passing numbers.
You're talking about different contexts.
2003 and 2016 isn't quite as dramatic a change, but the point is made.
The rules haven't changed much at all the last 13 years. Strategies have just evolved. Teams don't shoot mid range jumpers off the dribble and insist on running post up plays for big men and having maybe 2 shooters on the floor now. Teams learned to value floor spacing and defending the fast break. It's not like all the rule changes in football that have been or in to kneecap defenses.Also, and I say this whenever anyone matches up historical teams across any sport....
Are the Warriors playing 2003 basketball? Or 2016 basketball?
Because that matters.
You could argue that it was a deliberately slower pace to effectively limit the opposing offense.Those teams are close enough together in era to compare them. The offense the Pistons ran - hell EVERY offense that Larry Brown ran was archaic and got slapped up regularly even during a time when 90 points a night was doing okay. You could argue that the Pistons had the worst offense of any championship team of the past 20 years.

naw i'm just sayinYou could argue that it was a deliberately slower pace to effectively limit the opposing offense.
Look breh, I've already agreed with you TWICE that I think GS would win.
What's your problem?
You're mad because I don't think it'd be a sweep?
![]()

Fluke ass championship team.
Low Key I see this as a side diss to LeBron to dismiss what they just pulled off.
Never forget it rip, never forget it:
Me too. I was a huge fan of sheed and Big Ben, but that offense was just
Even with them getting back there the following year, Miami went up 3-2 when Wade got hurt. They likely get closed out in game 6 with a healthy Wade. They were an anomaly. Every other championship team save for maybe the 2003 Spurs since the 2000 finals was a highly potent offense except them. Sheed going full retard and leaving Horry open is part of my point. They had a razor thin margin for error on defense because of how bad their offense was. Going into the fourth quarter of game 7 in Sam Antonio neither team had cracked 60 points. That's just not going to cut it against modern contenders who are both deep and stocked with plenty of shooters to space the floor and force the defense to stay at home unless they're willing to give up the open 3.
GS has no heart so I could see the pistons beating them if things got chippy.
.They lost to the Spurs in seven games in the Finals next year, and they beat that Miami team that ended up the champions the next season. How are they overrated?That Pistons team was overrated, real talk.
They obviously played great in the Laker series, but Miami took them to 7 the next year, and then they lost in the finals to SAS. Then the year after that (when they were supposed to be one of the GOATS), Miami ended their reign.
And nobody puts that Miami team in the conversation in terms of best teams ever but the team they almost beat one year, and came back to beat the next year is supposed to be?
The man said he was hurt. What reason is there to not believe him?

Yeah.
You serious?