100-100 is a "slightly" slower pace for the Cavs if they make their shots at the typical rate.
So by what sorcery are they only going to slow down themselves a little, but manage to slow down the Warriors a lot? Warriors have been averaging damn near 120ppg this postseason even with the starters sitting a lot of fourth quarters, and the Cavs have a BAD defense on top of that.
So far this postseason Lebron and Kyrie have been averaging 57ppg on 40 shots/game. And that's facing defenses like Indiana and Boston and Toronto without Lowry.
Last year Bron and Kyrie both went off in the Finals, and they still only averaged 58ppg on 46 shots/game. And no one said they were "shooting horribly".
You obviously don't have a clue how many shots it usually takes to score that many points.
If you have Bron/Kyrie scoring 10 points MORE than their average against better defenders than they been facing, then yeah, they're going to need at least 10 shots more to do it.
You can't use their best game of the entire year against the fukking Boston Celtics matador defense and then pretend that's what they're going to do four times against Draymond-Durant-Iggy-Klay-Curry.
They've played the Pacers, the Raptors without Lowry for most the series, and the Celtics without IT most the series, and you're bragging that they "only" gave up 110+ three times so far? (and none of them been blowouts - don't know why you made up that shyt)
They're about to go up against a team whose THIRD option on offense is better than the best player on the court for most of those games.
Love, Frye, Jefferson, Korver, Deron, Kyrie (who is hurting a bit).
That's 60% of their rotation that is going to have trouble on defense. You really think that TT/Lebron/JR/Shump are so good they can make up for it?