Nah...Brady is a great, but he doesn't seem to be a clear front runner imo. Montana is a clear front runner imo.
There's just too much controversy over his wins...whether its cheating with Spy-gate, deflate-gate or the bad opposing calls by other teams in big games with the Seahawks and the Falcons.Just "lucky" moments where teams who were clearly going to beat them just made the worst decision possible. it seems that as time passes, people just forgot about that stuff or purposely ignore it and go by the end result.
To simply say 5>>>4 and then not to add in other factors such as his losses (yes those work against him imo) and the fact that the league is very QB friendly and the fact that Brady has never had a chance to work without Belicheck to prove that's it's him and not just the coaching are too questionable.
Montana is undefeated with 4 SBs without the controversy, plus he took a team like the 93' Chiefs to the AFC chamionship with little to no help. But what keeps Brady in the discussion IMO, is not really just the number of SBs, it's the SBs along with the number of playoff runs and the fact that he's always been a top 3 QB every year for so long, even winning league MVP just last year. That in itself is amazing and his numbers are almost untouchable.
Montana is still #1 though. There's no question to what he accomplished. Brady on the otherhand hand got "lucky" and/or was caught cheating in a few instances.
why do you consider the top 10 NFL quarterbacks of all time?
...you dudes are straight crazy. Moss was not at the end of his career in 2007, he was in his 9th. The dude caught 98 passes for 23 TDs that year.