staticshock
Veteran
Working at a school with black students, black teachers, black admins in the black Mecca Atlanta, I wear my hair any damn way I please 

Basically they want someone that doesn't have a history of ambition. They want someone that is just happy to have a job and will be easy to abuse .the "shut up and just work"type. People with qualifications know what is not acceptable and acceptable in the workplace.I've always wondered why employers say the bolded![]()
While its fukked up, be real:I've always wondered why employers say the bolded![]()
Exactly why I’m glad I’m blue collar.
The employers in the trucking and refinery scene don’t give af about me having dreads and I can still make good money too.
Yet this also shows why we need more black businesses on the rise
Dreads are not a natural style. You choose to put your hair in dreads. If they made afros an unacceptable style, then that would be different. That is how our hair naturally grows from our head. Now when they apply this rule to women is when it's blatent, because long hair is not acceptable for men in corporate environments.
As for my kids, I wouldn't loc their hair unless they were old enough to specifically ask for it. I'm not going to give them a style that is permanent unless cut off, if they don't ask. I'm also not going to make a hairstyle more important than money, and generational wealth.
Again, if we had more of our own corporations, we wouldn't have these problems, and we could make our own corporate dress code. But when folks aren't even getting the experience to soak up, and branch out because of a hairstyle, that's not going to happen.
The irony of this statement and smiley combo."As long as i get mine" head ass nikka
bald headed bytch
Solo and a bit over a year. Once I get enough experience I’m gonna go back to the refinery and drive the trucks there.How long you been trucking for breh? Team or solo?
This is fukkin bullshyt. Cacs know exactly what they're doing. They would never try this shyt on a Hasidic Jew. They write laws that leave them just enough leeway discriminate against nonwhites (especially Black people) indirectly.According to the case file, Jeannie Wilson, a human resources manager for CMS, commented on Jones’ dreadlocks during a private hiring meeting to discuss scheduling conflicts, telling Jones, “they tend to get messy, although I’m not saying yours are, but you know what I’m talking about.” Wilson told Jones that CMS would not bring Jones on board with dreadlocks, terminating the job offer.
- SHARE THIS —
RELATED: CHARLENE DANCE IS TAKING THE NATURAL HAIR MOVEMENT GLOBAL
In their suit, the EEOC claimed that this was a violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964’s Title VII, arguing that dreadlocks are a “racial characteristic” that have been historically used to stereotype African-Americans as “not team players” and as unfit for the workplace. Therefore, claiming that dreadlocks do not fit a grooming policy is based on these stereotypes and inherently discriminatory, as dreadlocks are a hairstyle “physiologically and culturally associated” with African-Americans.
![]()
Rushay Booysen / Getty Images
The court of appeals disagreed, ruling that CMS’s “race–neutral grooming policy” was not discriminatory as hairstyles, while “culturally associated with race,” are not “immutable physical characteristics.” In essence, traits in a person’s appearance that are tied to their culture but are otherwise changeable are not protected and can be used to deny job offers.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act has been routinely interpreted by the courts to only protect against “immutable characteristics” and not cultural practices. In Garcia v. Gloor, the courts ruled against the plaintiff, arguing that being fired for speaking Spanish at work despite their employers English-only policy did not violate Title VII.
RELATED: ALLEGED DISCRIMINATION AGAINST DALLAS PREP SCHOOL STUDENTS OFFERS A LESSON
Restrictions against dreadlocks have also been implemented in schools. This past July, Attica Scott, whose daughter is a student at Butler Traditional High School in Louisville, Kentucky, tweeted the dress code distributed by the school, which specifically prohibited “dreadlocks, cornrows, and twists.”
Follow NBCBLK on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram
You racist piece of cac shyt, you...They can work for Church's Chicken. We hire no matter the hairstyle
WHITE mainstream, WHITE womenBut yet tattoos is good money now that mainstream and most importantly women have embraced them.