Why is Jesus blasphemed but no other religion's figure is?

2 Up 2 Down

Veteran
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
30,187
Reputation
3,421
Daps
73,850
Reppin
NULL
It is if you continue trying to misrepresent a democracy.

Americans aren't beheading journalists over pictures.​
:why: WTF are you even talking about? Misrepresent how? This isn't about what is happening in other countries. In America, Christianity is used to repel rights and push bigotry by the right wing. You got hate groups that use Christianity as it's base.
 

Koichos

Pro
Joined
Oct 11, 2017
Messages
1,719
Reputation
-776
Daps
2,344
Reppin
K'lal Yisraʾel
I'm shocked that Jews do it too but then again modern day Hebrew was revived by using Arabic and some other languages.
There has never been a period in Jewish history where Jews did not read, write, and speak Hebrew. The proof of this is that the famous medieval Jewish Bible commentary of Rav Sh'lomoh Yitz'hoqi or 'Rash"i', who lived in Troyes, France (about 150 kilometers southeast of Paris) in the eleventh century (who was born in ד׳ת״ת or 4800/1040 and died in ד׳תתס״ה or 4865/1105) was written in pure Hebrew—and, what is more, Rash"i's commentary (which continues to be the most favored of all Hebrew commentaries to this day because of its clear and lucid language) is aimed specifically at the layperson rather than the Torah scholar (there are other, far more detailed, Hebrew commentaries that are used by scholars). Perhaps someone would care to explain how a Bible commentary written nearly a millennium ago—and intended to be read by laypeople instead of the elite, academic classes—can possibly be in Hebrew if the language had 'died'.

Furthermore, Rabbeinu Moshah ban Maimon or 'Ramba"m' (who was born in ד׳תתצ״ה or 4895/1135 and died in ד׳תתקס״ה or 4965/1204) sailed to Yisroʾel in 1165 at the behest of his father, Rav Maimon ha-Dayyon ha-S'faraddi, where they lived in the coastal city of ʿAkko (just across the bay from Heifoh or 'Haifa', 15 kilometers away to the southwest; ʿAkko was an ancient city and is mentioned as early as Shof'ṭim 1:31) and then in Y'rusholayim, finally settling in the city of Fustat, Egypt. It was there that Ramba"m composed the Mish'néh Torah, a monumental work that codifies the entirety of Jewish jurisprudence, arranged by topic, and deals individually with every one of the laws—written in pure Hebrew; and he gives a number of dates for its composition in the actual text, referring to shonoh zo 'this [present] year' as 4936 (1176), e.g., in Hil'choth Sh'miṭṭoh w'Yovel §10:6 and as 4938 (1178) in Hil'choth Qiddush ha-Hodhash §11:16.


A modern Hebrew-speaker would understand what was being asked if I said: ?הַאַתָּה רוֹצֶה מַשֶּׁהוּ לִשְׁתּוֹת, אֲדוֹנִי. Now, all five of those words are found frequently in the T'na"ch (i.e., Bible). For example, הַאַתָּה 'do you...?' occurs in Shof'ṭim 13:11; רוֹצֶה is the present participle of the preterit רָצָה 'wanted', which occurs in Div'ré Hayyomim ʾAlaf 28:4; the infinitive-construct לִשְׁתּוֹת 'to drink' occurs 19 times, the first of which is in B'reshιth 24:22; אֲדוֹנִי 'sir' (or occasionally אֲדֹנִי; not to be confused with one of the Creator's titles אֲדֹנָי, occasionally אֲדוֹנָי), which is directly equivalent to the French monsieur and the German mein Herr, occurs over 160 times, the first of which is in B'reshιth 23:6; and, while מַשֶּׁהוּ is not found in the T'na"ch, it is nevertheless a combination of the two words מַה שֶׁהוּא (literally 'what it is'), and is a colloquialism for 'something'—so, the question that a Hebrew speaker would understand was: 'Do you want something to drink, sir?'.

Most Muslims are practicing Muslims, therefore they are considered Noahides.
For goodness sake, it really is so simple: observant or otherwise, Muslims (or any noch'ri, for that matter) are only considered Noahites if they observe the seven miss'woth di-b'nei No'ah [because God commanded their observance in the Torah and made it known through Moshah]—not merely mi-p'nei hach'réʿa ha-daʿath ('out of intellectual conviction')—i.e., not 'just because they seem like a good idea'.

God sent them Prophets for 1000+ years straight (Isac to Malachi)
Our first prophet was ʾAvrohom ʾOvinu, the great-great-great-great-grandson of ʿEvar (see B'reshıth 11:10-14, 11:14-27):
א וַיִּסַּע מִשָּׁם אַבְרָהָם אַרְצָה הַנֶּגֶב וַיֵּשֶׁב בֵּין־קָדֵשׁ וּבֵין שׁוּר וַיָּגָר בִּגְרָר׃
ב וַיֹּאמֶר אַבְרָהָם אֶל־שָׂרָה אִשְׁתּוֹ אֲחתִי הִוא וַיִּשְׁלַח אֲבִימֶלֶךְ מֶלֶךְ גְּרָר וַיִּקַּח אֶת־שָׂרָה׃
ג וַיָּבֹא אֱלֹהִים אֶל־אֲבִימֶלֶךְ בַּחֲלוֹם הַלָּיְלָה וַיֹּאמֶר לוֹ הִנְּךָ מֵת עַל־הָֽאִשָּׁה אֲשֶׁר־לָקַחְתָּ וְהִוא בְּעֻלַת בָּעַל׃
ד וַאֲבִימֶלֶךְ לֹא קָרַב אֵלֶיהָ וַיֹּאמַר אֲדֹנָי הֲגוֹי גַּם־צַדִּיק תַּהֲרֹג׃
ה הֲלֹא הוּא אָמַר־לִי אֲחֹתִי הִוא וְהִוא־גַם־הִוא אָמְרָה אָחִי הוּא בְּתָם־לְבָבִי וּבְנִקְיֹן כַּפַּי עָשִׂיתִי זֹאת׃
ו וַיֹאמֶר אֵלָיו הָאֱלֹהִים בַּחֲלֹם גַּם אָנֹכִי יָדַעְתִּי כִּי בְתָם־לְבָבְךָ עָשִׂיתָ זֹּאת וָאֶחְשׂךְ גַּם־אָנֹכִי אוֹתְךָ מֵחֲטוֹ־לִי עַל־כֵּן לֹא־נְתַתִּיךָ לִנְגֹּעַ אֵלֶיהָ׃
ז וְעַתָּה הָשֵׁב אֵשֶּׁת־הָאִישׁ כִּי־נָבִיא הוּא וְיִתְפַּלֵּל בַּעַדְךָ וֶחְיֵה וְאִם־אֵינְךָ מֵשִׁיב דַּע כִּי־מוֹת תָּמוּת אַתָּה וְכָל־אֲשֶׁר־לָךְ׃
1 Then ʾAvrohom traveled away from there toward the Naghav [or Negev, 'dry'] land, and settled between Qodhesh and Shur; he stayed for some time at Ğ'ror.
2 ʾAvrohom used to say about his wife Soroh, 'She is my sister'; so ʾAvimalach, the king of Ğ'ror, sent and took Soroh.
3 ʾAlohim came to ʾAvimalach in a dream that night and told him, 'Look, you are going to die on account of the woman you have taken—she is a married woman!'
4 Now ʾAvimalach had not gone near her, and so he said: Hashem! will you even kill an innocent nation?
5 Did he [i.e., ʾAvrohom] not say, 'She is my sister', and did she not say herself, 'He is my brother'? I did this with a pure heart and innocent hands!
6 Then the ʾAlohim answered him in the dream, 'I know perfectly well that you did it with a pure heart and so I, Myself, prevented you from sinning against Me; that is why I did not let you touch her!
7 Now give the man back his wife because he is a prophet, and he will pray on your behalf and you will live; but know that, if you do not give [her] back [to him], you and all you have will die for sure!' (B'reshιth 20:1-7)

After those Prophets were sent I believe that the covenant between God and Jews was severed
Y'shaʿyohu 41:8-9 provides an effective rebuttal to fools and liars who pretend that the Creator has 'rejected' or 'disowned' ʿAm Yisroʾel:
וְאַתָּה יִשְׂרָאֵל עַבְדִּי
יַעֲקֹב אֲשֶׁר בְּחַרְתִּיךָ
:זֶרַע אַבְרָהָם אֹהֲבִי
אֲשֶׁר הֶחֱזַקְתִּיךָ מִקְצוֹת הָאָרֶץ
וּמֵאֲצִילֶיהָ קְרָאתִיךָ
וָאֹמַר לְךָ עַבְדִּי־אַתָּה
:בְּחַרְתִּיךָ וְלֹא מְאַסְתִּיךָ
...but you, My servant Yisroʾel—
Yaʿaqov
, whom I chose—
My beloved ʾAvrohom's zaraʿ!
I will grab you back from the ends of the Earth
and separate you from
[among] its nobles;
I will say to you, 'You are My servant!
I chose you and I never rejected you!'

due to attempting to murder the Messiah
Capital punishment could only be handed down in Jewish Law by a Minor Synhedrion consisting of twenty-three Judges, sitting in the lish'kath hağğozith ('Chamber of Carved Stone'); but the Romans removed the Jewish Courts' jurisdiction in capital cases around about the year 28 CE (i.e., '40 years before the Temple was destroyed'—Shabboth, folio ṭéth-wow, column ʾalaf; Sanhédhrin, folio mem-ʾalaf, column ʾalaf; ʿAvodhoh Zoroh, folio héth, column béth). Nevertheless, 'that man' was, if anything, a 'false prophet' who deserved death (D'vorim 13:6, 18:20), because he made at least one 'prediction' that never happened (Mattaʾi 24:1-2, Markus 12:1-2; Luqos 19:41-44).

after already murdering Prophets of the past.
This is yet another example of the antisemitic Jew-hatred that fills the pages of the Greek Dreck; it can hardly be said that 'the Jews' are all guilty of propheticide just because ONE prophet was ever killed by ONE Jew. This is similar to Yushkeh's characterization of all the P'rushim as 'hypocrites' (Mattaʾi 23:13-33) on the evidence that... oh, wait, I forgot—without bothering to adduce any evidence at all...

The proof of this is how God hasn't sent another Prophet to the Jews since Jesus.
Actually, that was Malʾochi, the anonymous prophet whose three chapters bring Sefar Taré ʿAsar (or Book of the Twelve Prophets) to a close. 'Malʾochi', however, was not his actual name, but a pseudonym borne out by Malʾochi 3:1 which literally means 'My messenger'.

Prophecy was removed from the world in the time of the ʾan'shei k'nasath hağ'dholoh, the 'legislative assembly' who governed Yisroʾel during the Second Commonthealth period; the ʾan'shei k'nasath hağ'dholoh existed at the very beginning of the Second Temple Period.


This man in Jewish tradition should have all the hallmarks of an anti-Messiah and they overcame great test from God as he
"deceived 2 billion people even today".
There is not any 'anti-Messiah' anywhere in the T'na"ch, nor is there a single verse that associates the word מָשִׁיחַ moshiyah with 'saving' of any kind. And, moreover, we have had many 'messiahs', including Shoʾul, the first king of united Yisroʾel (Sh'muʾel ʾAlaf 12:3, 12:5, 24:6 [x2], 24:10, 26:9, 26:11, 26:16, 26:23; Béth 1:14, 1:16); his successor Dowidh, the father of Sh'lomoh (Sh'muʾel Béth 19:22, 22:51, 23:1; Tahillim 18:51); and the pious King Yoshiyyohu (ʾEichoh 4:20; compare with Div'ré Hayyomim Béth 35:25). Shoʾul, Dowidh and Yoshiyyohu are explicitly referred to as a מָשִׁיחַ. All our messiahs, with the single exception of Shoʾul, have been from the Royal Family.

Instead, shortly after his death, Rome destroyed Jerusalem and the Jews scattered and powerless. No Prophet or King for over 2000 years.
Hosheʿa son of Bʾeri (who was a greater prophet than any of his contemporaries Y'shaʿyohu, ʿAmos and Michoh) says explicitly:
...כִּי ׀ יָמִים רַבִּים יֵשְׁבוּ בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל אֵין מֶלֶךְ וְאֵין שָׂר וְאֵין זֶבַח וְאֵין מַצֵּבָה וְאֵין אֵפוֹד וּתְרָפִים
Yisroʾel's descendants will be left without a king or a prince, sacrifices or obelisks, ʾefodh or t'rofim for many years... (Hosheʿa 3:4)

Hosheʿa's prophecies were addressed to both southern and northern provinces. Nowhere is this clearer than in the passage just quoted, with its three contrasted pairs 'without (i) a king or a prince, (ii) sacrifices or obelisks, (iii) ʾefodh or t'rofim'; the prophet Hosheʿa refers to the southern province's rulers as 'kings', while the self-styled northern monarchs are described merely as 'princes'. He then constrasts
(i) the divinely-ordained sacrificial rituals practiced in the southern province's Y'rusholayim Temple with the northern provinces idolatry, represented by the Baʿal-'obelisk' that ʾAhʾov ordered to be erected in the northorn province of Shom'ron (which was removed by his son Y'horom (also called Yorom) as recorded in M'lochim Béth 3:2), and

(ii) the ʾefodh ('tunic') prescribed by the Torah to be worn by the kohanim in the southern province's Y'rusholayim Temple with the t'rofim ('household idols') that were common in the northern province (the word t'rofim is best known from B'reshιth 31:19, 31:34 and 31:35 where it is recorded that Rohel 'stole' her father Lovon's t'rofim).

In our tradition, Allah has made a covenant with us Muslims now.
Unless you can produce even one ancient manuscript that says כי בישמעאל יקרא לך זרע in B'reshıth 21:12, this claim is clearly a non-starter.
 

shopthatwrecks

Certified Babble Detector Badge Number #281713
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
45,027
Reputation
11,523
Daps
120,075
Reppin
44 bricks...acre shaker
great uncle said god n the devil are the same...

why would God break his own rules... to allow his son to be born....

what did the devil do that was bad..except make adam n eve woke to the bullshyt...

God could have prevented everything that followed kicked them out of eden, he knew what was gonna happen...yet allowed it ...

nikka made joseph a cuck...


jesus found a poor n squalid land n used miracles n charitable acts 2 become the people's messiah....... he profited from the misery of the masses but did nothin 2 end their suffering on a permanent basis..... instead.... he claimed that our sins would be forgiven if we pledge our souls 2 him. ......Even murderers and rapists can ascend to paradise by selling their souls to christianity

that doesnt sound devilish to u ??
 

Koichos

Pro
Joined
Oct 11, 2017
Messages
1,719
Reputation
-776
Daps
2,344
Reppin
K'lal Yisraʾel
What is your opinion on this and how would Jews explain this Prophetic drought
because Malachi never said he was the Last Prophet? From what I've read that's just an assumption.
Where was the reward for removing Jesus the alleged Blasphemer?
Why would God forget his people for 2000 years and counting?
Both ʿAzroʾ 2:63 and N'hamyoh 7:65 clearly and unequivocally demonstrate that prophecy had already ceased by their time (according to ʿAzroʾ 7:8-9, the scribe ʿAzroʾ arrived in Y'rusholayim following the Return in ʾArtah'shas'tʾ's (that is, King Darius I) seventh year).
(i) ʾOsof ban Barach'yoh was one of the choral administrators who were appointed to supervise the Temple choir and orchestra under Dowidh and his son Sh'lomoh (see Div'ré Hayyomim ʾAlaf 6:24, 15:17), and he composed twelve of the Tahillim (chapters 50, 73-83)—one of which prophetically predicts that prophecy was going to end
אוֹתֹתֵינוּ לֹא רָאִינוּ
אֵין־עוֹד נָבִיא
:וְלֹא־אִתָּנוּ יֹדֵעַ עַד־מָה
Our signs—we have not seen [them],
there are no more prophets
[literally, 'there is no prophet anymore'],
and
[there is] not with us [any] one knowing how long [this exile will last]. (Tahillim 74:9)


(ii) In the time of the scribe ʿAzroʾ, after the Babylonian exile, N'hamyoh (who was also called by the obscure title ha-Tir'shothoʾ or 'the Tir'shothoʾ', see N'hamyoh 8:9, 10:2) disqualified those kohanim whose genealogical records had been lost from eating sacrificial food of the most sacred class 'until a kohen for the ʾUrim and the Thummim arises' (ʿAzroʾ 2:63, N'hamyoh 7:62). Now, 'the ʾUrim and the Thummim' were part of the Head Kohen's robes that served as a kind of oracle by means of which the Kohen donning them was able to 'inquire of Hashem' and receive prophetic revelations, and it is clear from this ruling that prophecy had already ceased by this time.

-------------

There are also three references to the end of prophecy in the apocryphal books of Hash'monoʾim (what the noch'rim call 'Maccabees'), namely in the first two (Hash'monoʾim ʾAlaf and Hash'monoʾim Béth), which are included among the K'thuvim ʾAharonim: those books that we consider to be apocryphal or 'historically unreliable'; still, the references can be found in Hash'monoʾim ʾAlaf 4:46, 9:27, 14:41.
 

Uitomy

Superstar
Joined
Nov 17, 2016
Messages
12,452
Reputation
1,710
Daps
44,646
Reppin
Anxiety attacks and sugar cookies
great uncle said god n the devil are the same...

why would God break his own rules... to allow his son to be born....

what did the devil do that was bad..except make adam n eve woke to the bullshyt...

God could have prevented everything that followed kicked them out of eden, he knew what was gonna happen...yet allowed it ...

nikka made joseph a cuck...


jesus found a poor n squalid land n used miracles n charitable acts 2 become the people's messiah....... he profited from the misery of the masses but did nothin 2 end their suffering on a permanent basis..... instead.... he claimed that our sins would be forgiven if we pledge our souls 2 him. ......Even murderers and rapists can ascend to paradise by selling their souls to christianity

that doesnt sound devilish to u ??
That’s the price of free will. Also the serpent in the garden apparently wasn’t satan
 
  • Dap
Reactions: MMS

Koichos

Pro
Joined
Oct 11, 2017
Messages
1,719
Reputation
-776
Daps
2,344
Reppin
K'lal Yisraʾel
Let me educate you with facts, the old testament is preserved in the Hebrew language
Oh? Does the following look like Hebrew to you?
:כִּדְנָה תֵּאמְרוּן לְהוֹם אֱלָהַיָּא דִּי־שְׁמַיָּא וְאַרְקָא לָא עֲבַדוּ יֵאבַדוּ מֵאַרְעָא וּמִן־תְּחוֹת שְׁמַיָּא אֵֽלֶּה

How about the second half of this verse?
וַיְדַבְּרוּ הַכַּשְׂדִּים לַמֶּלֶךְ אֲרָמִית מַלְכָּא לְעָלְמִין חֱיִי אֱמַר חֶלְמָא לְעַבְדָךְ וּפִשְׁרָא נְחַוֵּא׃
 

MMS

Intensity Integrity Intelligence
Staff member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
26,777
Reputation
3,843
Daps
31,947
Reppin
Auburn, AL
great uncle said god n the devil are the same...

why would God break his own rules... to allow his son to be born....

what did the devil do that was bad..except make adam n eve woke to the bullshyt...

God could have prevented everything that followed kicked them out of eden, he knew what was gonna happen...yet allowed it ...

nikka made joseph a cuck...


jesus found a poor n squalid land n used miracles n charitable acts 2 become the people's messiah....... he profited from the misery of the masses but did nothin 2 end their suffering on a permanent basis..... instead.... he claimed that our sins would be forgiven if we pledge our souls 2 him. ......Even murderers and rapists can ascend to paradise by selling their souls to christianity

that doesnt sound devilish to u ??
we see our lense first then the image we are discerning. In you and your uncles case you need to take the lense off and read genesis with a clear mind first.
 

Anhur

All Star
Joined
Oct 31, 2017
Messages
514
Reputation
2,801
Daps
2,741
There has never been a period in Jewish history where Jews did not read, write, and speak Hebrew.
It was a dead language and was only used in religious settings similar to Coptic Egyptian and Latin.
It was revived in the 19th Century using Arabic and some other languages.


For goodness sake, it really is so simple: observant or otherwise, Muslims (or any noch'ri, for that matter) are only considered Noahites if they observe the seven miss'woth di-b'nei No'ah [because God commanded their observance in the Torah and made it known through Moshah]—not merely mi-p'nei hach'réʿa ha-daʿath ('out of intellectual conviction')—i.e., not 'just because they seem like a good idea'.
Most Muslims don't even know the 7 Noahide laws as we don't read the Old Testament because we see it as corrupted.
Islam is just naturally in accordance with it so a practicing Muslim upholds those 7 laws without even being aware of it.




Y'shaʿyohu 41:8-9 provides an effective rebuttal to fools and liars who pretend that the Creator has 'rejected' or 'disowned' I chose you and I never rejected you!'

A covenant, promise, pact, agreement, etc always has 2 sides. Both sides must honour the agreement
or it would be null and void.

Genesis 17:14 (The covenant can be nullified)
Leviticus 26:15 (The covenant can be broken or violated)
Deuteronomy 29: 19-25 (The covenant can be abandoned)
Deuteronomy 30: 1 (They will be scattered among the nations for breaking the covenant which happened after the alleged crucifixion)

Throughout Leviticus 26 it describes the punishment of breaking the covenant but also says
that all can be forgiven if the servants of God ask for forgiveness.
That's the point. They never asked God to forgive them for supporting the alleged crucifixion of the Messiah.
Thus, Jerusalem was sacked and its people scattered even to this day. Therefore, the only explanation is that the covenant remains broken.


This is yet another example of the antisemitic Jew-hatred that fills the pages of the Greek Dreck; it can hardly be said that 'the Jews' are all guilty of propheticide just because ONE prophet was ever killed by ONE Jew.
I didn't say anything anti-Semtic. All I did was state a fact that is declared in the OT, NT, and Quran.

The spirit of God then invested Zechariah son of Jehoiada the priest. He stood up before the people and said, ‘God says this, “Why transgress Yahweh’s commands to your certain ruin? For if you abandon Yahweh, he will abandon you.” * They then plotted against him and, at the king’s order, stoned him in the court of the Temple of Yahweh (2Chronicles 24:20-21).

Elijah responds: “I am full of jealous zeal for Yahweh Sabaoth, because the Israelites have abandoned your covenant, have torn down your altars and put your prophets to the sword. I am the only one left, and now they want to kill me” (1Kings 19:9-10)

As you can see it is very clear that this claim didn't come from nowhere.



There is not any 'anti-Messiah' anywhere in the T'na"ch,
I know there's no anti-Messiah in Jewish tradition but my point was that there was no the reward for stopping
this man of ""great evil"" who managed to trick billions of people over 2000 years. Instead of a reward, Jerusalem
was sacked and its people scattered. That doesn't make any sense. If he was an evil magician who blasphemed
against God defeating him should've brought some sort of blessing because clearly he was charismatic enough
to touch billions of souls. Instead it looks like the people were punished which was the point of my
comment.


Both ʿAzroʾ 2:63 and N'hamyoh 7:65 clearly and unequivocally demonstrate that prophecy had already ceased by their time (according to ʿAzroʾ 7:8-9, the scribe ʿAzroʾ arrived in Y'rusholayim following the Return in ʾArtah'shas'tʾ's (that is, King Darius I) seventh year).
I got a big culture shock moment while reading Psalms 74. In the Quran, almost all chapters begin
by praising Allah but Psamls 74 started with blasphemy.

Regardless, out of all the verses and chapters you mentioned it was the only one that explicitly mentioned
no more Prophets. The verse sound more like a complaint than a decree. If I remember correctly, there were
multiple Prophets alive at the time and some that came after.
Ezekiel, Daniel, Jeremiah, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi, Obadiah, Joel, etc.

If the age of Prophecy was over it would explicitly be mentioned by God multiple times and He would
send a major Prophet to end it not a minor Prophet like Malachi who's identity is obscure (PBUT).
For us Muslims, Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) told us multiple times that he is the final Messenger from Allah
and none will come after him. It also clearly stated in the Quran that he's the seal of the Prophets.
There is no questioning or assumptions being made in Islam like how it is in your tradition.
The end of the age of prophecy shouldn't need demonstrations, explaining or proof. It would just be decreed.



Unless you can produce even one ancient manuscript that says כי בישמעאל יקרא לך זרע in B'reshıth 21:12, this claim is clearly a non-starter.
Us Muslims do not read or believe in your scriptures since we believe that they are corrupt.
So we should look at something more objective like history since we can both agree on that.

I believe in the covenant that God had with the children of Israel because there is historical evidence
to support it. If we look at Egypt, a nation that was the most powerful in the world for 2 millennia,
it has become a turnstile for Empires since Prophet Musa PBUH saved his people over 3000 years ago.
It has not recovered even to this day.
Its language is lost and the graves of its kings desecrated and looted.
The same fate happened to the Babylonians and Assyrians.
So we can clearly see that there is a pattern here and a strong one at that. It should be impossible
for those cultures to be so weak for millennia when they were the most powerful in the world for millennia.

For us Muslims there's also historical proof of our covenant. Christianity was oppressed for centuries.
It took followers of the religion centuries to syncretize the religion with Pagan concepts like the trinity for it to be accepted by the Romans.
While Islam spread immediately and quickly. The early Muslims defeated Rome and Persia AT THE SAME TIME
which is unheard of. It's like Myanmar or Tanzania defeating the US and Russia at the same time.
It should've been impossible but here we are. Muslims also took Jerusalem peacefully, twice.
Umar Ibn Al Khattab the second leader of the Rashid Empire also reintroduced Jews into Jerusalem
after finding out they were massacred and expelled from the city. He also cleared the "temple mount" of
rubble and garbage along with his army because it was used as a dumpster by the Romans.
On top of that, wherever Islam spread to had a golden age.
In West Africa Mali became the richest empire and its king the richest man in history after Suleiman PBUH.
There was also the Songhai and Kanem Bornu who were also very powerful.
North Africa had Cairo and the Moroccans taking Cordoba which became one of the best cities in the world.
East Africa had the Somaii Sultanates and Swahili city states that were immensely wealthy and beautiful.
Kilwa which is a Swahili city was considered the most beautiful city to Ibn Battuta.
Islam in Arabia and Iran doesn't even need any explanation.
The Mughals of India and Pakistan were one of the wealthiest empires in history.
Everywhere Islam touched became Gold and flourished. It's on track to become the largest religion in the world before 2050.
 

Rell Lauren

Banned
Joined
Nov 30, 2016
Messages
29,000
Reputation
-2,911
Daps
111,819
Reppin
NYC
Muslims would issues a Fatwa if you did that to Muhammad and the Jews would economically blackball you.
 
Top