On what bases did you come to the conclusion that a hadith graded as Hasan (Good) was fabricated? Can you send me a link?
You're a troll who clearly suffers from reading comprehension skills.
Let's try this again for the THIRD time, the Quran is memorized, it has an oral tradition not written it was memorized orally are you with me from the time of the Prophet Muhammad PBUH.
This perceived goat can eat as many pages it likes, people memorized it. It did not need to be compiled through a book in the time of Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him, because he was there revealing it and people were memorizing it.
And as God states in the Quran:
"Whatever communications We abrogate or cause to be forgotten, We bring one better than it or like it. Do you not know that Allah has power over all things"
The codex cynaticus and the vaticanas have extra books in them (you would not know this cause you're too afraid of opening your scripture to see the many historical inaccuracies and contradictions) they have the shepherd of hermes and the epistle of barnabus.
These are not canonized books, so why are they left out of the Bible?
Your European church fathers state they cannot be trusted but will not give a criteria for it because there is no criteria.
You're throwing stones from a glass house no Christian scholar worth his weight would dare argue on the merits of the Bibles preservance against the Quran's.
Stay in your lane, you have no knowledge on the subject you're talking about.
You're making a fool out of yourself.
I legitimized this conversation far too long.
Your questions are done, next time you quote me I'll be doing the interrogation and let's see how much you know about your European Paulian religion which blasthemes Jesus's peace be upon him true message.