Wikileaks Vault 7 release

[88m3]

 

[Pressure]

I see the agents are here asking why we're okay with having a strong clandestine service as though the answer isn't obvious.

 

[General Mills]

They care about it as much as people who were outraged over Benghazi

Touche great point

 

[Dr. Acula]

people really in here for the CIA, the fukking CIA, one of the worst agencys ever in the worlds history, on a hiphop board at that























seriously tho, the CIA?

Not caping for the CIA personally. However I'm not going to ignore the fact that Wikileaks isn't a neutral party either anymore, if ever.

 

[greenygreen]

Not caping for the CIA personally. However I'm not going to ignore the fact that Wikileaks isn't a neutral party either anymore, if ever.

so to you unless wikileaks divides their leaks equally between dem and repubs then the info isn't legit? is less significant? the fukk is this crossfire?

dems been in office last 8 years so the leaks is about dems

when bush was in office leaks was about cons

but anyway this is about the CIA so why are you making this a partisan issue?

 

[MoneyTron]

 

[NvrCMyNut]

Another day when Alex Jones was proven correct on his insane theories from years ago, meanwhile CNN fans pedel baseless conspiracies created by the deep state to cover their ass.

At this point being a neo liberal is to be opposed to/ignore the truth.

 

[ill]

I see the agents are here asking why we're okay with having a strong clandestine service as though the answer isn't obvious.

That deflection game is so strong with you. The only agent is you.

"Strong clandestine service" =/= violating Constitutional rights, privacy, etc.

I'd wager you fully support the Patriot Act as well..

 

[Dr. Acula]

You guys need to take a hard look in the mirror and ask yourselves why you're willing to give up your Constitutionally protected civil rights so the CIA can listen to your Samsung TV microphone. Fairly disgusting tbh.

"Oversight and lots of bureaucracy to prevent abuse"? Is that a fukking joke, Nap? You think the CIA is gonna have oversight on their illegal surveillance programs?

I'm not naive to think that there is no possibility that CIA is spying on USA citizens, but from all the information I've seen so far, this is targetting foreign individuals, is it not?

They are exposing the source codes of how these hacking programs bypassed natural security measures in place of several devices in order to spy on foreign people. I was under no delusion this did not take place. Once you show that american citizens who are not part of a foreign spy operation are the target then my alarm bells will go off. Otherwise this seems like a data dump for information sake. Not caping, but again, I don't think anyone thought that the CIA wasn't using every means possible to hack people and engage in cyber warfare.

The most concerning thing I've seen so far is that they "lost control" of their malware. Reminds me of the Stuxnet worm that was released a while back.

 

[NY's #1 Draft Pick]

Can someone please point out the links between assange and the Russians?

 

[Black White Sox Hat]

they dropped this shyt at the wrong time

too much going on in the world right now

it's going to get pushed to the back

 

[Dr. Acula]

so to you unless wikileaks divides their leaks equally between dem and repubs then the info isn't legit? is less significant? the fukk is this crossfire?

dems been in office last 8 years so the leaks is about dems

when bush was in office leaks was about cons

but anyway this is about the CIA so why are you making this a partisan issue?

there is no goal to be "equal". If there is more dirt on one side than the other, it is what it is. However, this is not what is happening. Like I said, and I hate I can't quote it again, but there have been several tweets made under the wikileaks account that have been partisan and defensive in regards to this administration than others. If you want to play "Assange is just an anarchist" card then you wouldn't see defensive statements for the current president in the united states. Also just because the president is a democrat doesn't mean republicans disappeared. They had congress for 6 out of 8 years during that time.

If the reports that RNC and various state republican legislatures were also hacked but there was a selective release of information in order to hurt one side over the other, then you can't claim neutrality. Period.

1.) Assange is extremely hurt by actions of the Obama administration
2.) He may not be a willing patsy, but he is getting a ton of information from a particular party in order to help spread their propaganda,
3.) Or worse, he is a knowing patsy and is acting on said party behalf under the guise of "anarchist wanting to watch the world burn...in certain circumstances"

Didnt they throw a hissy fit when the Panama papers were released despite being transparency adovcates? I find that odd.

 

[greenygreen]

Can someone please point out the links between assange and the Russians?

 

[Pressure]

That deflection game is so strong with you. The only agent is you.

"Strong clandestine service" =/= violating Constitutional rights, privacy, etc.

I'd wager you fully support the Patriot Act as well..

the CIA having tools that allow them to snoop is no different than the military having advanced weaponry. You are clearly conflating the having of tools with that being an inherent infringement on constitutional rights. This is not true and poor logic.

But you're Russian.

 

[Paradise50]

I'm divided...while I think having access is necessary in certain situations. I don't want them misusing it on your avg every day American for other purposes