blatantlyobvious
Blatant
Dude, it's for her own good...rather he knows the results or not, she should be getting tested for herself.
Sent using Tapatalk 2
Essential Quick Lil Gems on Dealing with Women
- Thread starter Rominati
- Start date
Dude, it's for her own good...rather he knows the results or not, she should be getting tested for herself.
Sent using Tapatalk 2
"1. No marriage. Marriage has become nothing but the temporary “for as long as I feel like it” arrangement that nearly always results in divorce, and the stripping of assets and children, and parental rights from men, and often, the continued enslavement of men via alimony. Furthermore, as a partnered man, you are probably even more at risk of false allegations than a swinging dikk because false allegations are being enabled, and becoming standard tools for women to use in order to extract further benefits upon divorce, and separation and to further remove the man from her life, and the children’s lives. It is far too dangerous a deal for a man to consider, and even if you think not, it is going to get worse.The marriage deal you agree to today will be rewritten and amended behind your back via feminist lobbyists exerting their will over the legislative process while you wait for the inevitable divorce to come.
2. No defacto. In many jurisdictions, de facto holds exactly the same weight as marriage, and in the jurisdictions where it does not, it soon will. If you agree that marriage is too dangerous, then you must rule out living together, too. Since you only undertake these arrangements with a view to “until death do us part,” what do you think the chances are of the rules not being amended during your life time? And if it’s not death do us part, but temporary that you are planning, then why do it?
What temporary relationship is worth the risk, and the cost of the ass reaming you will get via family law, if she chooses to strap that giant dildo on at the end? You have no say in whether she chooses to use the tools that have been made available to her. Her word is not worth the paper it’s not written on. Pre-nups may or may not hold legal weight in your jurisdiction at the time you enter into such agreements, but at the time of dissolution they are toilet paper, just waiting for the government and feminists to peel it off the roll, wipe and flush.
3. No children. Obviously if you aren’t going to marry a woman, or live together, then you would have to be crazy to have children with one. It can only result in you eventually being removed from their lives, and paying child support, regardless of any deals you have with her. Family courts need not honor either verbal or written agreements you have with her. Let breeders be responsible for populating the world, and let breeders pay the price for it.
4. No monogamy. This one results in the most objections, even from MGTOW. But think about it. If you rule out the other three No’s, what reason is there to agree to monogamy, and what reason does a woman have to agree to monogamy with you? Jealousy? Insecurity? A fear of competition? A distaste for women who sleep around? Why? Have not women the same right to go their own way, also? Indeed, if as MGTOW, we are going to reject marriage, and other forms of committed relationships, then we are faced with either life-long celibacy, or acceptance of the non-monogamous woman. As long as you are trying to go your own way, but seek to have a pet woman, who is monogamous to you, you are seeking two mutually exclusive things and that very desire will see you surrendering control.
Is this monogamous relationship going to be for life? If not, then why bother? Who will break this relationship off, and what will be the fallout when that happens?"
MGHOW: My journey | A Voice for Men
2. No defacto. In many jurisdictions, de facto holds exactly the same weight as marriage, and in the jurisdictions where it does not, it soon will. If you agree that marriage is too dangerous, then you must rule out living together, too. Since you only undertake these arrangements with a view to “until death do us part,” what do you think the chances are of the rules not being amended during your life time? And if it’s not death do us part, but temporary that you are planning, then why do it?
What temporary relationship is worth the risk, and the cost of the ass reaming you will get via family law, if she chooses to strap that giant dildo on at the end? You have no say in whether she chooses to use the tools that have been made available to her. Her word is not worth the paper it’s not written on. Pre-nups may or may not hold legal weight in your jurisdiction at the time you enter into such agreements, but at the time of dissolution they are toilet paper, just waiting for the government and feminists to peel it off the roll, wipe and flush.
3. No children. Obviously if you aren’t going to marry a woman, or live together, then you would have to be crazy to have children with one. It can only result in you eventually being removed from their lives, and paying child support, regardless of any deals you have with her. Family courts need not honor either verbal or written agreements you have with her. Let breeders be responsible for populating the world, and let breeders pay the price for it.
4. No monogamy. This one results in the most objections, even from MGTOW. But think about it. If you rule out the other three No’s, what reason is there to agree to monogamy, and what reason does a woman have to agree to monogamy with you? Jealousy? Insecurity? A fear of competition? A distaste for women who sleep around? Why? Have not women the same right to go their own way, also? Indeed, if as MGTOW, we are going to reject marriage, and other forms of committed relationships, then we are faced with either life-long celibacy, or acceptance of the non-monogamous woman. As long as you are trying to go your own way, but seek to have a pet woman, who is monogamous to you, you are seeking two mutually exclusive things and that very desire will see you surrendering control.
Is this monogamous relationship going to be for life? If not, then why bother? Who will break this relationship off, and what will be the fallout when that happens?"
MGHOW: My journey | A Voice for Men
I honestly don't know why but a lot of women who were raped or molested become very promiscuous and can't stay in stable functioning relationships
"Your typical semi-attractive young woman comes from a home in which her father is either emotionally absent from working his ass off to care for his family; or is hopelessly betaized; or is divorced from her mother. Our heroine lost her virginity at 16 to a 17-year old defensive tackle shes known since they were both 5 and started kindergarten together. After this she embarks on a journey to find herself.
She gets a BF in college. After a couple of months she has sex with him to get it over with. She then drops out (essentially flunks out) after deciding shes in the wrong place and the wrong major. She returns home and to her high school party friends. She becomes a full fledged party girl, experimenting with all kinds of sex and all kinds of chemically-induced altered states. She racks up a few one night stands (because hey, shes a StrongIndependentWoman (TM) and shes looking for love and growing and gaining life experience). She has a few BFs that last 6 months or more; but most of her sexual experiences are blackout-drunk episodes or hookups at the end of long nights of partying. Somewhere in there she finished her college degree after a couple of DUI convictions.
Then she reaches age 27 and has an N of 20. Shes ready to settle down with fukkbuddy Rockbanddrummer, a guy she knew from HS and who used to hang out at the parties. Hes traveling with his band. Shes staying at their shytty apartment, supporting him. He cheats on her whenever she can. He gives her a sexual disease. She has had enough of his maltreatment and finally breaks up with him.
Shes 29, with a high N and a Im a serious bytch who dont take no shyt from any man and you go grrrrrl attitude. Shes now ready to find a provider who can support the child(ren) she wants (whether he actually sires that child is another story). She will play at Happy Homemaker and fake it as long as she can. The real story comes out after the wedding vows are spoken. She then decides shes in charge."
Anyone want to wife this queen up?
She gets a BF in college. After a couple of months she has sex with him to get it over with. She then drops out (essentially flunks out) after deciding shes in the wrong place and the wrong major. She returns home and to her high school party friends. She becomes a full fledged party girl, experimenting with all kinds of sex and all kinds of chemically-induced altered states. She racks up a few one night stands (because hey, shes a StrongIndependentWoman (TM) and shes looking for love and growing and gaining life experience). She has a few BFs that last 6 months or more; but most of her sexual experiences are blackout-drunk episodes or hookups at the end of long nights of partying. Somewhere in there she finished her college degree after a couple of DUI convictions.
Then she reaches age 27 and has an N of 20. Shes ready to settle down with fukkbuddy Rockbanddrummer, a guy she knew from HS and who used to hang out at the parties. Hes traveling with his band. Shes staying at their shytty apartment, supporting him. He cheats on her whenever she can. He gives her a sexual disease. She has had enough of his maltreatment and finally breaks up with him.
Shes 29, with a high N and a Im a serious bytch who dont take no shyt from any man and you go grrrrrl attitude. Shes now ready to find a provider who can support the child(ren) she wants (whether he actually sires that child is another story). She will play at Happy Homemaker and fake it as long as she can. The real story comes out after the wedding vows are spoken. She then decides shes in charge."
Anyone want to wife this queen up?
Ocho fukked up, here's why:
Evelyn is 42 years old -- strike one.
Evelyn was a teenage mother & never has been married before Ocho -- strike two & three.
Evelyn is a known groupie & "gold-dug" 500k from Antoine Walker..
Need I go on?
Evelyn is 42 years old -- strike one.
Evelyn was a teenage mother & never has been married before Ocho -- strike two & three.
Evelyn is a known groupie & "gold-dug" 500k from Antoine Walker..
Need I go on?
yea last year i was dealing with this chick that did the same, talked nothing but bad things about her ex....but still sleeps with him whenever
Being a bad ex>>>Being the first after the him. If she never mentions previous men you should continue from there.
You thought that one out. I try not to mess with girls who had too much time on their hands for starters unless you know, it's just for fun.
I been stupid for a female before, in fact plenty. 
You live and you learn.Rocket Scientist
Superstar
What do you guys think about married women who dont wear their wedding rings everyday? Am I the only one noticing this trend? You see women around a office talking about they are married,but no rings.Or they wear it one day and next day its not there literally.
Scustin Trillberlake
Banned
"I understand youre frustrated with your male partner because he doesnt do what you see as his fair share of domestic work (i.e. cleaning, taking care of the kids, whatever). I can imagine that would be annoying to you, and I can certainly see why you experience it as unfair.
If the situation is intolerable to you, you can always leave him, of course though I realize the vast majority of people genuinely love the people they pair off with and are usually reluctant to dump them over socks sitting on the bedroom floor. So I can understand why you likely would see that as a rather extreme option for what seems to you like a problem that ought to be resolvable with a less extreme solution. Like your mate putting his dirty socks in the damn hamper, for example.
However, before I line up behind your banner proclaiming that More Than Half The Housework Is Unfair! I have a couple of questions for you:
1. Before pairing up with your current spouse, how did you attempt to filter your dates to eliminate domestic non-helpers and attract men who were more domestically inclined?
2. Who was considered more socially dominant and/or higher on the social hierarchy when you first started going out? You, or him?
3. Who explicitly asked who out first? You, or him?
4. Who was making more money when you first started going out? You, or him?
5. Who explicitly initiated sex first? You, or him?
Now, if your answers are not really anything, him, him, him, and him, and then I trust you can see the problem. But there are those who will read this that might be a little slower than you, so Im going to spell it out. What youre asking for is for your post-courtship relationship to be even-steven, even though before and during courtship you were perfectly happy to enjoy the benefits of a wildly imbalanced relationship where the man took on all the risks of overt rejection, and where your standards had nothing to do with finding a man with egalitarian values. Instead you chose one who embodied the dominant, high-on-the-social-hierarchy, patriarchal values that you now chafe against.
Youre far from being alone in doing this, of course, which is a big part of the problem. (At least this appears to be the case in America; some commenters have pointed out that courtship is a lot more egalitarian in Sweden.). Even among feminists, I suspect that only an extremely minute percentage of women could honestly say that, I actively looked for domestically-inclined men when I was dating and was indifferent to social dominance or how much money they made. I was the one who asked my spouse out, and I was the one who initiated sex the first time.
In fact, even among feminists, I suspect that the percentage of women who would honestly answer the above questions with not really anything, him, him, him, and him, would be disconcertingly high (though Id hope it would be less than half).
Until that changes until a very significant percentage of women embody egalitarian standards during courtship as well as wanting them post-courtship it seems unrealistic to me to expect significant numbers of men to embody the post-courtship egalitarianism that some are demanding. The simple fact is, you dont get to enjoy a post-courtship relationship without having passed muster during pre-courtship first and for most men, thats a much bigger hurdle than it is for most women. If dominant, patriarchal men are the ones valued on the dating market, thats what most men will concentrate their efforts on becoming.
And in fact, if you insist on post-courtship relationships being egalitarian as a matter of fairness while being indifferent to the inegalitarian aspects of relationships prior to that point, youre not just being unrealistic. Youre being hypocritical."
http://www.feministcritics.org/blog...rated-with-partner’s-housework-noh/#more-3635
Bolded is pure weapons grade ether.
If the situation is intolerable to you, you can always leave him, of course though I realize the vast majority of people genuinely love the people they pair off with and are usually reluctant to dump them over socks sitting on the bedroom floor. So I can understand why you likely would see that as a rather extreme option for what seems to you like a problem that ought to be resolvable with a less extreme solution. Like your mate putting his dirty socks in the damn hamper, for example.
However, before I line up behind your banner proclaiming that More Than Half The Housework Is Unfair! I have a couple of questions for you:
1. Before pairing up with your current spouse, how did you attempt to filter your dates to eliminate domestic non-helpers and attract men who were more domestically inclined?
2. Who was considered more socially dominant and/or higher on the social hierarchy when you first started going out? You, or him?
3. Who explicitly asked who out first? You, or him?
4. Who was making more money when you first started going out? You, or him?
5. Who explicitly initiated sex first? You, or him?
Now, if your answers are not really anything, him, him, him, and him, and then I trust you can see the problem. But there are those who will read this that might be a little slower than you, so Im going to spell it out. What youre asking for is for your post-courtship relationship to be even-steven, even though before and during courtship you were perfectly happy to enjoy the benefits of a wildly imbalanced relationship where the man took on all the risks of overt rejection, and where your standards had nothing to do with finding a man with egalitarian values. Instead you chose one who embodied the dominant, high-on-the-social-hierarchy, patriarchal values that you now chafe against.
Youre far from being alone in doing this, of course, which is a big part of the problem. (At least this appears to be the case in America; some commenters have pointed out that courtship is a lot more egalitarian in Sweden.). Even among feminists, I suspect that only an extremely minute percentage of women could honestly say that, I actively looked for domestically-inclined men when I was dating and was indifferent to social dominance or how much money they made. I was the one who asked my spouse out, and I was the one who initiated sex the first time.
In fact, even among feminists, I suspect that the percentage of women who would honestly answer the above questions with not really anything, him, him, him, and him, would be disconcertingly high (though Id hope it would be less than half).
Until that changes until a very significant percentage of women embody egalitarian standards during courtship as well as wanting them post-courtship it seems unrealistic to me to expect significant numbers of men to embody the post-courtship egalitarianism that some are demanding. The simple fact is, you dont get to enjoy a post-courtship relationship without having passed muster during pre-courtship first and for most men, thats a much bigger hurdle than it is for most women. If dominant, patriarchal men are the ones valued on the dating market, thats what most men will concentrate their efforts on becoming.
And in fact, if you insist on post-courtship relationships being egalitarian as a matter of fairness while being indifferent to the inegalitarian aspects of relationships prior to that point, youre not just being unrealistic. Youre being hypocritical."
http://www.feministcritics.org/blog...rated-with-partner’s-housework-noh/#more-3635
Bolded is pure weapons grade ether.
HabitualLineSteppa
....Fuh Q.
@ the breh talkin about STI's and what not...Trust me fam, I case these hoes and STAY gettin checked my damn self...I'll go on a limb and vouch for shorty to (she has endometriosis and stays goin to the doc/getting tested) Note: My older sister has known her longer than I have... Older sis is mad protective n shyt and cases hoes for me with out me even askin...The story pans out
Moving on, to my breh Reincar, shorty gave me the whole run down about the aftermath of the BD situation...did counseling for a good 3 years hardbody but the time shortly after everything happened left her mind on some other shyt for a minute (didn't help she was in her early 20's and at rising to her prime looks either)....You kno how it go...Chicks get violated and use sex as a means of control and empowerment or whatever...I say it's terrible logic and even weaker judgement but chicks are emotional and weaker then men so what better way to make a nikka weaker than her than to trick him into blowin dough to get a taste (the simp/trick angle)
She knows I don't fukk around nor do I entertain such foolishness...Shorty even said that's the main reason she's up on it so tough cause I'm genuine with this shyt....bytch try n "run that game", I'll axe that ass (she's been warned of this from the jump
) (but then again, bytches be "Evelyn's and whatnot)...To conclude, shorty gives a mean BJ, she cooks her ass off, cops me shyt from time to time and loves my dirt draws....I have standards so I won't wife but I got me a nice anchor leg for the winter months and those "slow" nights n shyt so I'm chillin
Well if your keeping her on the side by all means 
I've been burned to much by projects on the side or wifing that I stay away now
Chicks will tell you everything to make you think they are honest and don't keep secrets like other hits while in reality when they mes up they can pull out the you knew I was like this
I've been burned to much by projects on the side or wifing that I stay away now
Chicks will tell you everything to make you think they are honest and don't keep secrets like other hits while in reality when they mes up they can pull out the you knew I was like this
Women from best to worst:
*Prostitutes (whores) are are some of the most honest women you will meet. They provide a service and the price is up front. There's nothing wrong with being or hiring a whore.
*Sluts are dumb whores. They provide the service for free or very cheap. I feel bad both for them as well as men who think they are innocent victims of male lust.
*A normal wife uses a man for the whole of his life in return for dwindling amount and quality of lousy sex. She will denounce sluts and whores but uses the concept of love to get a lifetime of free labour and resources. And don't forget divorce, alimony, child support and STRESS.
Its not sluts or whores a man must be careful of but regular / innocent / religious / normal wife material woman.
http://www.theuniversityofman.com/blog/2012/5/21/the-art-of-whore-why-betas-marry-leftovers.html
*Prostitutes (whores) are are some of the most honest women you will meet. They provide a service and the price is up front. There's nothing wrong with being or hiring a whore.
*Sluts are dumb whores. They provide the service for free or very cheap. I feel bad both for them as well as men who think they are innocent victims of male lust.
*A normal wife uses a man for the whole of his life in return for dwindling amount and quality of lousy sex. She will denounce sluts and whores but uses the concept of love to get a lifetime of free labour and resources. And don't forget divorce, alimony, child support and STRESS.
Its not sluts or whores a man must be careful of but regular / innocent / religious / normal wife material woman.
http://www.theuniversityofman.com/blog/2012/5/21/the-art-of-whore-why-betas-marry-leftovers.html