Include Kobe but not Kareem or Duncan brehs.
Al Jefferson best low-post player I've seen recently.
ARE U RETARDED?
Include Kobe but not Kareem or Duncan brehs.
Al Jefferson best low-post player I've seen recently.
Kobe was nasty in the post, but I always find it funny when people say no one else did it like Kobe as if Jordan didn’t do the same moves first and better
Except Jordan didn't.
Kobe most certainly took a lot of his post-play from MJ (that is undeniable), but he added to it: more counters, more shot-types, and better footwork. Not only in his desire to be better, but the climate of the league forced him to be - as I said in my previous post, he had to deal with zone defense, and better defenders/schemes than MJ did.
KOBE HAD BETTER FOOTWORK AND A BETTER SHOT THAN MJ
Better 3 point shooter yes
Better mid range nah
And how does Kobe have better footwork than mj when Jordan did all of those moves 10-15 years earlier
When it comes to guards Jordan’s post game is unmatched
Better 3 point shooter yes
Better mid range nah
And how does Kobe have better footwork than mj when Jordan did all of those moves 10-15 years earlier
When it comes to guards Jordan’s post game is unmatched
I can see why you picked Hakeem. I still feel its really close between Kobe, Hakeem and MJI may have written something other than "some" people say it's McHale at first but then I edited it because I want to stop being quite that divisive.
McHale had a lot of moves and his freakishly long arms were as much an asset as some other guys' athleticism. But his post game was like something that happened on the side, a one-on-one matchup between him and some poor helpless defender. Hakeem's post game could be the central point of an entire Finals. That's what I feel separates him from a lot of the other guys on the list - some guys had only a few moves but were extremely effective (Shaq, Kareem), other guys had great footwork and tons of moves but didn't score at a very high efficiency, McHale had a ton of moves AND he scored at a high efficiency, but only Hakeem put it all together against entire teams and won titles on the back of his post game as the central component.
This is false, and again that whole Kobe stole everything from MJ argument needs to be deadedBesides crossovers there’s not one move that Kobe did that Jordan didn’t, maybe you didn’t watch mj to know
MJ took alot of moves from Dr J. Who gives a fukk? Only haters that use this garbage take to try to bring down Kobe. Kobe had more post moves then MJ
MJ's advantage over Kobe was he was more physically dominant...bigger hands, a little bit taller, probably slightly more athletic and more durable. Kobe was often playing through injuries
Skill wise Kobe is every bit as good as Mike and probably even a little better
Can you show me some of the moves jordan took from dr j? I'm curious to see especially since aba games weren't even aired like that back in the day.
show me receipts like this ,there's like 4-5 videos of kobe doing identical(especially post moves) moves as jordan
This is false, and again that whole Kobe stole everything from MJ argument needs to be deaded
I see it like this, yes its true Kobe took alot from MJ. So, whats wrong with that? Should he had studied just role players like a John Starks or Jeff Hornacek?
I already said it in here but Kobe is a basketball historian. He knows the game going back to its origins, he loves the sport just as much as anyone else ever did
MJ took alot of moves from Dr J. Who gives a fukk? Only haters that use this garbage take to try to bring down Kobe. Kobe had more post moves then MJ
MJ's advantage over Kobe was he was more physically dominant...bigger hands, a little bit taller, probably slightly more athletic and more durable. Kobe was often playing through injuries
Skill wise Kobe is every bit as good as Mike and probably even a little better