shyt that dude is probably like these HL "blacks" in that he thought their white ass smelled like roses before he got his wake up call.
It still based on complexion. If you take racism, in India for example, is still based on the concept that Darker skinned people are inferior to fairer skinned people. It's misinformation because it's attempting to act as though these are different forms of racism when they are all the same.
this argument goes out the window when u bring up the fact that black people are disproportionately charged with crimes compared to white people. White people are statistically more likely to be committing crimes but are targeted less.Also in the Americas, those classified as Black disproportionately participate in more hate crimes per capita compared to Whites
I gave you a more in depth criticism. Please kill yourself.Nah...its not the same..the Indian Caste system is Intolerance but its NOT racism per se since its discrimination WITHIN the same race...and that model is still based on economics like i pointed out earlier.
Historically the darkest People were the peasant farmers and laborers who toil under the sun all day..the lighter ones are the merchants ,civil servants,tradesmen who get a little sun but not too much..the lightest of all were the wealthy ruling elite ...somewhere along the line centuries ago these traits became stratified into a caste system that tied social class and wealth with skin complexion and a strong desire not to lose social standing because upward mobility was limited.
If you were born poor odds were you would die poor ..and the biggest general identifier of your social standing was complexion
I gave you a more in depth criticism. Please kill yourself.
You also have no understanding of the north Indian vs south Indian dynamic.
For example a Patel vs a Gowda. Height and fairness play a large role in the Indian structure even within classes or castes.
You don't know what you're talking about.
The last names we associate with Indians are regional and provincial. That also largely corresponds with race.Nah im good on that...but you go ahead and give it a shot
wait..so you postulate that a "Patel" and a "Gowda" are different races?? because that was all i said...the caste system is intra racial and economic at its core..
why was it done? because you dont want your kids to fukk around and catch feelings for a lower class and reduce the family status which equals access to resources...These castes were about protecting money,power and resources...they weren't doing it for fun of it.
Wtf loldon't mod this forum, and barely ever lurk in here..
you the dude from Canada who got clowned for wearing construction paper hearts over your eyes, right..?![]()
Nah im good on that...but you go ahead and give it a shot
wait..so you postulate that a "Patel" and a "Gowda" are different races?? because that was all i said...the caste system is intra racial and economic at its core..
why was it done? because you dont want your kids to fukk around and catch feelings for a lower class and reduce the family status which equals access to resources...These castes were about protecting money,power and resources...they weren't doing it for fun of it.
So you're saying other factors beyond race is why India is less tolerant.Nah im good on that...but you go ahead and give it a shot
wait..so you postulate that a "Patel" and a "Gowda" are different races?? because that was all i said...the caste system is intra racial and economic at its core..
why was it done? because you dont want your kids to fukk around and catch feelings for a lower class and reduce the family status which equals access to resources...These castes were about protecting money,power and resources...they weren't doing it for fun of it.